The following are my comments and concerns for Trustee Lancaster and Trustee Igel regarding statements made by several Estes Park Housing Authority (EPHA) Board members, as reported in Patti Brown's Estes Valley Voice article,
"Housing Authority Draws 14 Applicants for Three Board Openings," referenced in the attached link.
I found it interesting that the discussion concluded with board members agreeing that appointees should support the Housing Authority's mission.
While Colorado law clearly gives the Town Board the authority to appoint Housing Authority commissioners, the expectation that appointees "should support the Housing Authority's mission" appears to be a subjective preference
rather than an objective.
I'm curious how that expectation is balanced with the importance of independent oversight and the value of having commissioners with diverse viewpoints and experiences.
Does supporting the Housing Authority's mission simply mean supporting the general goal of providing affordable housing? Or is it intended to mean that commissioners should also support the current board's policies, priorities,
or leadership decisions?
I believe those are important distinctions because governing boards are generally most effective when members can exercise independent judgment, ask difficult questions, and provide oversight while still fulfilling the organization's
mission.
No reply is necessary. I simply wanted to share my comments and concerns for your information and consideration.
Sincerely,
Christy Jacobs
E.P. Resident