What are strategies or best practices for working with financial institutions to promote gender and inclusion?
Dear colleagues,
Strategies for Financial Institutions? … We have similar discussions last two weeks in another forum… There are a lot of evidence suggesting that for women in male-headed households, feeling of lack of fair benefit from their effort, or the lack of control over their earned income disincentivize their willingness to make maximum efforts in the household engagement.
In countries like Uganda where our team earlier did an evaluation for Oxfam Novib, there is a demonstrated distinct gender division of tasks, roles and power, with women doing most of the cultivation work. …. Men typically did only a few heavy tasks, but also came back to harvest and sell the coffee beans, often spending the proceeds on alcohol or women in town. … Yet, where husbands continue to sell coffee without the consent of wives, the latter lost interest in taking care of coffee quality, apply new (environment friendly) agricultural technology; and they also sell un-ripe coffee beans, or beans which had not been fully processed (without husband’s knowledge!) even if they sold for less, to fulfil some cash needs (Farnworth, 2017; and Farnworth and Akamandaisa, 2011, https://empoweratscale.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Final-GALS-study-Bukonzo-Joint-coffee-VC-Uganda.pdf). There are many cases also from Liberia, and other countries.
I think one of the key issues often little discussed in research programmes is the potential contribution of having an (independent) SAVINGS account for women's financial lives. Such an opportunity ensures that wives can have ''control'' of income, and invest on e.g child care, or other productive activities. There are research outcomes highlighting the fact that women who are not sure of having control on her newly earned income (or even the newly accessed loan) are very reluctant to apply for loan -- even when the service is available nearby, and easily accessible!! (see an interesting recent discussion at CGAP/FinDev … https://www.findevgateway.org/blog/2022/06/how-do-savings-contribute-financial-health
However, women starting ‘’independent saving’’ can also give rise to mistrust and suspicion, and potential intimate partner violence in many contexts where patriarchy is dominant. Efforts need to be made to promote mutual TRUST and ultimate collaboration. There are already good example in ruralfinance working such ‘’gender transformative’’ interventions, including the Gender Action Learning System (GALS) (identified by UN-FAO (2020) as one of the most effective tools promoting gender equality (view at https://www.fao.org/3/cb1331en/cb1331en.pdf) as well as ‘’Gender dialogue’’’ programme by CARE./USAID. Ruralfinance ''group meetings'' (including VSLAs, Grameen bank group meetings), often conducted monthly and weekly, provide COST EFFECTIVE platforms to facilitate dialogues and trainings at regular intervals for participating women and men.
This activity also need to be complemented with ''gender mainstreaming strategies'', and awareness creation and tailored training at institutions' board, management, staff, etc
I hope this helps
Getaneh
At WEConnect International, our focus is on assisting women-owned businesses with access to markets, as it is our experience that there are many more organizations around the world which assist women-owned businesses with access to finance than access to markets. So I think others in this discussion are better positioned to answer this question.
Aceli has recently released a Learning Brief on Gender Inclusive Lending for Agriculture in Africa based on a gender inclusive loan analysis and inception to date portfolio metrics. Aceli and Value for Women facilitated a webinar distilling the findings from the gender lens investing technical assistance engagements with Mango Fund and Family Bank. Both organizations released blogs on the topic as well as case studies:
SDC has written a case study on Aceli Africa that profiles Aceli’s approach to incentivizing lending to agricultural small and medium enterprises in East Africa, key insights and results to date, and opportunities for the model to be applied to other markets.
We expect to publish a Technical Assistance Learning Brief and second annual Learning Report in Q1 2023 followed by a learning brief on Climate & Environment later in the year.
Thanks.
Hans.
Hi all,
Great points from all thus far.
After taking a moment to unpack this question, I believe that there are two underlying questions embedded within it.
These questions are not mutually exclusive – Palladium’s experience suggests that women-owned enterprises often prefer engaging with female loan officers and female FI staff, although it varies somewhat depending on geography, age, and a number of other factors. Therefore, promoting gender equity and opportunity for women within FIs is part of the solution for mobilizing capital to women.
How can we enable and incentivize financial institutions (FI) to more equitably serve women? At its core, this question speaks to how we can support behavior change within FIs. To reach this goal, Palladium has undertaken a number of gender diagnostics with bank and non-bank financial institutions globally and guided financial institution leadership as they benchmark the FI’s gender performance against its peers and identifies opportunities to better reach/serve women (see case study here). Often, diagnostics result in follow-on technical assistance to develop gender-responsive products and services or embed gender equity into other aspects of the business model. Under the USAID CATALYZE program, for example, Palladium conducted a gender diagnostic with BAC El Salvador and provided follow-on support to develop a data-driven financing product targeting women-owned MSMEs that has mobilized upwards of $2M in six months (see success story here).
One challenge that we often see when working with banks to develop gender-responsive products/services is the belief that there is limited-to-no pipeline for the products. Women-led enterprises are perceived as too small or too informal to qualify for financing. Palladium has found that Business Advisory Service Providers (BASP), and particularly women BASPs, can connect FIs with a pipeline of female clients and position the women-led MSMEs to submit successful financing applications (see success story here). BASPs can also enable FIs, particularly banks, to reach smaller women-led MSMEs by bundling them into groups to decrease transaction costs and mitigate risk. As implementing partners, we can support FIs forge relationships with BASPs and, in turn, enable FIs to more efficiently reach female clients.
While building awareness of actionable opportunities to capture the women’s market and providing support making the requisite adjustments to products/services/business models can enable FIs to better serve women, some FIs need a bit stronger of a nudge. As Hans noted, incentives can play a key role in motivating FIs to serve the segment by offsetting transaction costs and overcoming real and perceived risk. Under USAID CATALYZE, Palladium has partnered with financial institution globally to provide incentives to reach underserved sectors and segments and, in many cases, an additional bonus for serving women (see success story here). To date, multipronged approach to driving behavior change in FIs has mobilized more than $45 million in financing for W-MSMEs under the USAID CATALYZE program.
How can we promote gender equity within FIs?
As noted, we cannot separate FIs reach amongst women from the role of women within the FI. While data suggests that women are well-represented amongst FI staff overall, enhancing their role across the organizational structure is believed to increase responsiveness to the women’s market. Palladium includes questions on human resources and FI policies in gender diagnostics in line with our belief that promoting gender and inclusion in FIs requires all to look both internally and externally.
Looking forward to others’ thoughts as well.
Thanks,
Christine