Paulo Freire (1921-1997) Brazilian educational philosopherA weekly series of quotes from thinkers about how to help people help themselves
If you want to support this work with employee ownership and workplace democracy, then please click on the link below to contribute to the: Institute for Economic Democracy. IntroductionThe quotations from Paulo Freire are organized around five themes. The setting is the helper-doer relationship, e.g., the teacher-student, manager-worker, doctor-patient, social worker-client, consultant-client, psychotherapist-client, counselor-counselee, development assistance organization-client country relationships. Theme 1: Starting From Where the Doers AreA utopian social engineering approach tries to impose a clean model solution where, if necessary, the old solution is wiped away to make room for the new. To use a building metaphor, the old building is torn down to create a cleared space, a tabula rasa, upon which the new model building can be constructed. There is no need to take the characteristics of the old building into account—other than what is required to tear it down. The alternative non-utopian incremental approach would be to repair one part of the building at a time—which over time can still completely rebuild the building. Rebuilding the old, rather than destroying it to engineer a new model from the cleaned slate, is one way of introducing the theme of “starting from where the doers are.” For the helpers to help the doers help themselves, the helpers have to design their assistance taking into account the current starting point of the doers, not an imaginary clean slate.
Theme 2: Seeing Through the Doers’ EyesSince the goal is for the doers to help themselves, any assistance provided by the helpers needs to see the situation through the doers’ eyes. The doers’ actions will be guided by their knowledge, conceptual framework, values, and worldview, not those of the helpers. The strategy of help used by the helpers needs to be based on an empathetic understanding of the doers’ viewpoint in order to be effective.
Theme 3: Helper Cannot Impose Change on DoersThis is the counter-thesis to the direct or social engineering approach. Transformative change comes from the internally motivated self-activities of the doers. Carrots and sticks (e.g., aid conditionalities) used by the “helpers” will distort the own-motivation of the doers, externalize their locus of causality, and may produce conforming surface behavior and cunning resistance rather than transformation.
Theme 4: Help as Benevolence is IneffectiveAutonomy-compatible assistance is neither an imposition (theme 3) nor a gift (theme 4). Benevolent charity helps people, but it does not help people help themselves. It promotes dependency, not autonomy. The helpers are self-satisfied that their charity is helping others, but the doers are in the humiliating and degrading position of not helping themselves with the resulting resentment and thwarted self-reliance.
Theme 5: Doers in the Driver’s SeatThis central theme is simply a restatement of the goal of the assistance, to have the doers helping themselves. “Being in the driver’s seat” is the metaphor for autonomous self-activity. The car metaphor comports well with the other four themes. The car must: (1) start its journey from where doer-driver is, (2) the vision of the road ahead is from the vantage point of the driver, (3) it would be folly for guides (or “backseat drivers”) to grab the steering wheel and try to drive, and (4) being driven by someone else weakens self-reliance and self-esteem.
ReferencesFreire, Paulo. 1970. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Continuum. PolyMathy Musings / David Ellerman is free today. But if you enjoyed this post, you can tell PolyMathy Musings / David Ellerman that their writing is valuable by pledging a future subscription. You won't be charged unless they enable payments. © 2026 David Ellerman |