---------- Forwarded message ---------
De: 'Cong Ling' via pqc-forum
Date: sáb., 1 de ago. de 2026 às 11:29
Subject: [pqc-forum] Re: HAWK-n Key Recovery Reduces to SVP in Dimension n/2 + 1
To: pqc-forum
AI has now also surpassed humans in lattice theory... Today, OpenAI announced a new upper bound of
0.604 for the exponent of the sphere-packing density. Improving this upper bound has been a major open problem in lattice theory ever since Kabatiansky and Levenshtein established the previous best exponent of
0.599 in 1978. This is the first improvement in nearly half a century.
All,
NIST would like to thank the HAWK team for all the work they've done on their submission throughout the process. We have updated our Round 3 page for the onramp to indicate that HAWK has been withdrawn:
Dustin Moody
NIST PQC
Dear Steve and pqc-forum,
We would like to thank Anthropic for their contribution to the cryptanalysis of HAWK, and for communicating with us throughout.
We confirm that their attack approximately halves the block size required in lattice reduction to recover (an equivalent) secret key.
Naïve approaches to circumvent this, such as doubling parameters or moving to higher rank modules, make HAWK uncompetitive.
As such, we withdraw our candidate HAWK from NIST's ongoing additional signature scheme standardisation process.
Good luck to all the remaining candidates.
The HAWK team would like to thank everyone who has attacked, contributed to or discussed HAWK since the it's publication in 2022.
-- the HAWK team
Le mardi 28 juillet 2026 à 19:06:14 UTC+2, Steve Weis a écrit :
In the gate-count model of AGPS'20, the improved attack lowers the key-recovery cost of HAWK-512 from 2^150 to 2^108 and of HAWK-1024 from 2^288 to 2^182. We demonstrate this with a practical implementation that recovers a HAWK-256 secret key end-to-end in a few hours on a single server. The implementation can be found at:
https://github.com/anthropics/cryptography-research-demo
This result does not impact Falcon, ML-DSA, or other latticed-based schemes.
We would like to thank the HAWK team for their help verifying this result and for their feedback. We would also like to acknowledge that this was found by Claude, with minimal technical guidance from people. For more information on the process, please refer to the above blog post.
Thank you very much.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pqc-forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
pqc-forum+...@list.nist.gov.
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/a/list.nist.gov/d/msgid/pqc-forum/91299e2c-64c2-4f53-978b-7cd1b30cfea4n%40list.nist.gov.