Chair: Tarek Sayed Ahmed
Abstract: While first-order logic is undecidable as a whole, it has a rich and far from
exhausted syntactic fine-structure of decidable sublanguages. This talk will
focus on one of these, the Guarded Fragment, introduced by Andreka, van
Benthem & Nemeti in 1998, and still the subject of ongoing investigations.
'Guarding' means restricting quantifiers to range only over objects
occurring together in some atomic predicate fact in our models. It is
highly instructive to see how this avoids the patterns of quantification
that are needed to encode undecidable problems inside first-order logic.
At the same time, a quite different perspective is possible. One can also
see the Guarded Fragment as closely related to generalizing the standard
semantics for the complete language of first-order logic so as to relax the
mathematical assumptions that underlie [and explain] the undecidability.
This is done by allowing models having only restricted sets of admissible
assignments, much like the `teams' of modern logics of dependence and
independence. Many decidable logics live on this generalized semantics,
including CRS from the earlier algebraic logic tradition and its recently
introduced dependence logic extension LFD.
The two perspectives of syntactic fine-structure and generalizing the
semantics of first-order logic are closely connected by a number of
[both old and new] translation results. This raises the intriguing question
whether in logic, somewhat paradoxically, contracting [to a sublanguage]
and expanding [to a richer class of models] are two sides of the same coin.
The talk will explain all of the above in more technical detail, and end
with some general points for discussion.
Ref.
(1) H. Andreka, J. van Benthem & I. Nemeti, 'Modal Languages and
Bounded Fragments of Predicate Logic', Journal of Philosophical Logic,
1998. (2) H. Andreka, J. van Benthem, N. Bezhanishvili & I. Nemeti,
'Changing a Semantics: Opportunism or Courage?', in M. Manzano et
al., eds., Volume in Honor of Leon Henkin, 2014. (3) A. Baltag & J. van
Benthem, 'A Simple Logic of Functional Dependence', Journal of
Philosophical Logic, 2021.