Caríssimos amigos, mestres e colegas,
Quando encontro um artigo de que gosto, faço questão de o divulgar. E este inclusive é de autoria da estimada Valéria de Paiva que participa desta lista. O texto encontra-se no sítio academia.edu.
A Short Note on Intuitionistic Propositional Logic with Multiple Conclusions
By Valeria de Paiva
Manuscrito, 2005
It is a common misconception among logicians to think that intuition-ism is necessarily tied-up with single conclusion (sequent or Natural Deduction) calculi. Single conclusion calculi can be used and are convenient, but they are by no means necessary, as shown by such influential authors as Kleene, Takeuti and Dummett, to cite only three. If single conclusions are not necessary, how do we guarantee that only intuitionistic derivations are allowed? Traditionally one insists on restrictions on particular rules: implication right, negation right and universal quantification right are required to be single conclusion rules. In this note we show that instead of a cardinality restrictionm such as one conclusion only, we can use a notion of dependency between formulae to enforce the constructive character of derivations.
--
Você recebeu essa mensagem porque está inscrito no grupo "LOGICA-L" dos Grupos do Google.
Para cancelar inscrição nesse grupo e parar de receber e-mails dele, envie um e-mail para logica-l+u...@dimap.ufrn.br.
Para ver essa discussão na Web, acesse https://groups.google.com/a/dimap.ufrn.br/d/msgid/logica-l/A1F62497-5D44-4B84-87B3-224034452396%40gmail.com.