Reimagining the language of engagement in a post-stakeholder world
55 views
Skip to first unread message
Kenny Wallen
May 9, 2024, 6:55:32 PMMay 9
to SSWG Working Group List
Dear Colleagues,
Based on an initial online conversations and a workshop facilitated by Mark Reed, we used an open authorship model to publish a new article in Sustainability Science that builds on existing critiques of the stakeholder paradigm, summarizes the current practice and literature, and (1) critically examines current issues surrounding the use of the term stakeholder, (2) raises awareness and encourages dialogue more widely about issues inherent in the stakeholder paradigm, and (3) discuss whether it is appropriate to propose alternatives.
We hope this paper brings the issue to the attention of our colleagues, funders, editors, reviewers, and institutions to develop processes and language that can identify, represent, empower, and give voice to those we want our research to serve. Thank you.
Article:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-024-01496-4
Blog:
https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2024/05/07/should-we-stop-using-the-word-stakeholder-in-research/
Abstract:
Language matters in shaping perceptions and guiding behaviour. The term stakeholder is widely used, yet little attention is paid to the possibility that its use may inadvertently perpetuate colonial narratives and reinforce systemic inequities. In this article, we critically examine the limitations of the stakeholder concept and its ambiguity, normativity, and exclusionary implications. We emphasise the importance of using language that gives a voice to marginalised groups, promotes inclusion and equity, and fosters meaningful and reflexive participation in decision-making processes. In critiquing the use of the term and calling for alternative practices, we aim to contribute to the decolonisation of research norms and the creation of more inclusive and equitable societies. Therefore, rather than advocating a single alternative term, we suggest a focus on the people, places, and species affected by decisions, interventions, projects, and issues.
Citations:
Reed, M.S., Merkle, B.G., Cook, E.J. et al. Reimagining the language of engagement in a post-stakeholder world. Sustain Sci (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-024-01496-4
Based on an initial online conversations and a workshop facilitated by Mark Reed, we used an open authorship model to publish a new article in Sustainability Science that builds on existing critiques of the stakeholder paradigm, summarizes the current practice and literature, and (1) critically examines current issues surrounding the use of the term stakeholder, (2) raises awareness and encourages dialogue more widely about issues inherent in the stakeholder paradigm, and (3) discuss whether it is appropriate to propose alternatives.
We hope this paper brings the issue to the attention of our colleagues, funders, editors, reviewers, and institutions to develop processes and language that can identify, represent, empower, and give voice to those we want our research to serve. Thank you.
Article:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-024-01496-4
Blog:
https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2024/05/07/should-we-stop-using-the-word-stakeholder-in-research/
Abstract:
Language matters in shaping perceptions and guiding behaviour. The term stakeholder is widely used, yet little attention is paid to the possibility that its use may inadvertently perpetuate colonial narratives and reinforce systemic inequities. In this article, we critically examine the limitations of the stakeholder concept and its ambiguity, normativity, and exclusionary implications. We emphasise the importance of using language that gives a voice to marginalised groups, promotes inclusion and equity, and fosters meaningful and reflexive participation in decision-making processes. In critiquing the use of the term and calling for alternative practices, we aim to contribute to the decolonisation of research norms and the creation of more inclusive and equitable societies. Therefore, rather than advocating a single alternative term, we suggest a focus on the people, places, and species affected by decisions, interventions, projects, and issues.
Citations:
Reed, M.S., Merkle, B.G., Cook, E.J. et al. Reimagining the language of engagement in a post-stakeholder world. Sustain Sci (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-024-01496-4
Kenneth E. Wallen, Ph.D.
Associate Professor, University of Idaho
Department of Natural Resources and Society
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages