I've included my larger response to a similar question back in February 2024 below but the short answer is technically in your example it would be Option 2 but there is a 3rd step that didn't come into play in your scenario. We do not allocate all aid to need just because the student had need (option 1), but we do allocate as much of their total aid as is needed to satisfy need before reporting only the remainder as non-need based aid, even if the source of that aid was for non-need based.
The student is awarded a need-based scholarship = 1000 and
the student is awarded a non-need-based scholarship = 1500
option 3: Include the $1,000 in the need-based column and an additional $500 from the non-need based aid to satisfy their need. Then report the remaining $500 as non-need based aid because it was aid awarded in excess of their need.
This distinction is hidden amongst the instructions "Non-need-based scholarship or grant aid: Scholarships and grants, gifts, or merit-based aid from
institutional, state, federal, or other sources (including unrestricted funds
or gifts and endowment income) awarded solely on the basis of academic
achievement, merit, or any other non-need-based reason. When reporting
questions H1 and H2, non-need-based aid that is used to meet need should be
counted as need-based aid. "
John Dennis
Assistant Director of Institutional Research & Reporting
Office of Institutional Effectiveness
Columbia College Chicago
Message from February 27 2024
This may have been addressed privately, but maybe others will be helped in the future if so.
This
is certainly the most complicated section in my opinion so you're not
alone. If you're involved in or responsible for submitting the IPEDS
Student Financial Aid Survey last month then you're part way there as
the reporting period and some of the parameters are the same. The
biggest hurdle from that side is getting the financial aid data granular
enough to group it by aid type and use intention (need/merit).
Essentially we:
- Determine
the student's academic year estimated need. The cost of tuition, food
and housing, etc. that is used by the financial aid office when putting
together the student's aid package.
- Determine the student's
academic year awarded aid amount by aid type and any restrictions or
requirements of that money that might inform whether the aid would be
used to meet their financial cost of attendance.
- Note that the IPEDS Student Financial Aid Survey directs us to report AWARDED aid, not disbursed aid.
- 2023-24
Survey Materials Instructions What to Include - "NOTE: In this
component, "aid awarded" refers to grant or scholarship aid that was
awarded to students or to loans awarded to students. For reporting grant
or scholarship aid, institutions should report on aid that was awarded
to students. This amount may be different from the amount that was
actually disbursed to students. For example, a student may be awarded
grant or scholarship aid at the beginning of the academic year but then
leave the institution before the entire amount is disbursed. In this
case, institutions should report the original amount of grant or
scholarship aid that was awarded. For reporting loans to students,
institutions should continue to report on loans that were awarded to and
accepted by the student."
- (The hard
part) By student: Reduce their financial need value by deducting the aid
they were awarded and recording that amount into the reporting
"buckets".
- Beginning with need-based award totals listed in Section H1.
- ie $10,000 need minus $1,000 in Federal Pell grant, $1,000 in Institutional need scholarships etc.
- Once
all of the need-based aid they were awarded has been exhausted, if they
still have a financial need value then we start allocating aid that was
awarded to the student that was not exclusively awarded to satisfy
need. These could be academic merit scholarships, athletics awards,
external merit awards etc.
- The final page of the CDS Definitions
gives us a suggested order for allocating this "merit" money towards
their outstanding need.
- So a student who had a
financial need of $10,000 and received $6,500 in need-based awards would
still be estimated to have $3,500 remaining in need for the year. If
that student was awarded non-need restricted awards they would draw on
those awards to bridge the gap between their costs and need aid. For the
purposes of H1 we estimate and report that bridge money as if it was
awarded for need because the student will have essentially used it to
pay for what wasn't covered by their need-based aid.
At
the end of all of this we are trying to estimate how much money a
student was awarded but also note whether the aid they received was used
to meet their financial needs/cost of attendance, regardless of what
the aid fund's intention/purpose was. If the student would still have an
outstanding documented financial need at the end of their need-based
aid, then they have to pay for that somehow. Realistically we know that
most students will get to the end of ALL of their aid and still have
more owed out-of-pocket than the awards we recorded for them. This is
acknowledged in Section H2 items H and I.
For
my part I complete this process through an iterative recalculation of
the student's starting financial need. I start with their need value $X,
and then reduce it with each aid fund and record that reduction into
the appropriate bucket. The starting value $X gets smaller each time I
make an allocation, and then when all of their Need-Based aid is
exhausted I move on to "re-allocating" the amounts I would have reported
for them in the right side Non-Need-Based column of H1 until I run out
of aid or reduce the starting need value $X to zero. Anything that
remains of that student's Non-Need-Based aid is reported in the right
side columns. If the student had excess Need-Based aid it is still
reported as Need-Based. You don't re-allocate in the reverse to report
excess Need-Based as Non-Need-Based. In the end, H1 is reporting the
total dollar amount allocated to each of these buckets for all of the
reported students
Hopefully this will be helpful and I've not gotten it wrong somewhere in all of this.
John Dennis
Assistant Director of Institutional Research & Reporting
Office of Institutional Effectiveness
Columbia College Chicago