Re: In re Roberta Green

[CHRIS EIKENBERG]

More intimidation by this court through the Co-Guardian Lisa Lefehr who is now also trying to get the facility to keep me out with the collaboration of the judge at the last hearing on the record that state " you will have to serve her at the facility since she has no address"  made up b.s. yet it is on the USB provided to everyone.  The judge stated contempt of court goes both ways.  I will be filing for it along with a restraining order to keep her from influencing actions between live to assist and me.  Conversations between me and Michelle.

I have been contacted by Lisa after hours again for violation of the court order.  Interfering with conversations with Michelle who stated I could call her at any time or text her about a situation regarding communication.  Lisa does not know her boundaries because no one has ever told her to SHUT UP OR BUTT OUT.

Michelle,  She is over 21 and able to converse and a business owner, where Lisa does not own live to assist but continues to inject upon Michelle to break the law regarding visitation and communication which has already been established.  I too have a family  and time with them.  I have a church and regardless I am there for them but I turn off my phone now from    6pm and others are given an alternative phone number so family and church can get a hold of me.

I have had to do this because of the consistent contempt of court action by Lisa to ignore the judges orders of no contact by text between 9-6pm.  It is to be specific between me and through the week however she continues to violate this and needs to be restrained from involving Live to Assist in her plots.  She injects her opinions into conversations she is not part of.

On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 7:40 AM CHRIS EIKENBERG <cavel...@gmail.com> wrote:

	7:37 AM (1 minute ago)
to Kristen, chris, tips, max.calise, Brooke

Judicial legislation is what made mandatory reporters mandatory.  Your protection orders are not for Roberta but for Lisa Lefehr which is obvious by the way that they are written trying to keep what she is doing to use her Hospice knowledge to purposely kill my mother without making it look like murder.  Knowing my mom has a heart condition and not following doctor ordered compression hose and to not walk on her leg or it will cause stroke unless she has that hose on which has not been provided but staff has purposely encouraged her to do so.  Or giving her medication that keeps her throwing up food morning, afternoon and evening when there is an alternative solution to help her keep the meds down but for 7 months and loss of 10 lbs is not implemented.  Nor allowing her treatment to go the hospital when she has thrown up and she admits it to ENT and fire man of the diarrhea and inability to keep fluid down and yet being denied transport to rehydrate her just because she has a piece of paper that she waves and states I can do what I want with your mom. While I stand in horror that she has no medical background, obviously is not working in the best interest of my mother through a "court order being a caregiver". My mom suffers through three days and she is really weak and unable to be herself because of the strain from failing to get her treatment.  There is no justification for the protection orders, just statements without evidence of any harm to ROBERTA.  Since Roberta is making these statements and under the Law of Colorado I am a Clergy, Surgical Tech and a caregiver, you can't have a judge go against the legislative judicial branch or committee that created mandatory reporting.  I would suggest you get a 101 refresher course about legislative issues versus having a court grant "not calling for help for an at risk adult by a mandatory reporter which you're trying to use a judge to order such".  

Section 19 of C.R.S.  under who is a mandatory reporter the fine they will face.   would be a good start for you.   She slept cold again for two nights and trying to place blame on a woman that has dementia for being cold when the room and central heating do not exist for her comfort is professional and business wise appalling.  She pays for heat to be in her room and comfort and is not provided that..  My  father has called APS regarding how you do not keep her room warm.  He bought the space heater which you approved, and you do not check on her.  I had to report it to non-emergency to do a well check.  Police officer Krenze stated itis the responsibility of the facility to provide heat in each room and took the report.  It is not her fault having dementia and Live to Assist is not a skilled nursing facility to ensure she stays warm, puts on warm clothes and keeps blankets on because you are not a skilled facility for her.  HE SUGGESTED THAT SHE BE MOVED TO A SKILLED NURSING FACILITY.  My father has asked she be moved  and is ignored and he wants to move in with her to take care of her and that is ignored because of the prejudice.,  Judge states he is too old, yet he has proof from Veterans hospital doctors his of sound mind and body and can make those medical decisions for his wife, and then that same judge states he can't be a guardian if he can't hear.  Because his hearing aids are two years old and being replaced??  Meaning all deaf people or impaired people in her court are not counted able to take care of their family members.  WHAT A FAIR AGE DISCRIMINATORY AND DISABLED PHOBIC JUDGE my mother has to go along with your illegal PO to protect the court ordered POS caregiver who doesn't want to be held accountable for her actions and failures.

  As long as she is there eshe will be cold and sleep cold as there is no central air.  Furthermore since the "coo=guardian" is not doing anything to ensure she stays warm in your facility and she refuses to place her in the right one she will have to be checked on so she does not get pneumonia or sick due to the coldness of the room when she complains further.   Further attempts to state I have threatened anyone when I have never done so, just stated that I am a mandatory reporter and have to report what I hear and see, does not have limits of how often, and is not cause to attempt to keep me from my mother visitations that are set every Thursday.  Or when she calls asking I come by or by telephone that you attempt to limit her calls since Nov 27th 2023 via the co-guardians making yourselves unavailable for this at risk adult that depends on her family for mental health and vibrancy is now a ploy I suspect you are going to attempt to claim against me to keep me from seeing the conditions she calls me about.  I have never threatened anyone and that is stated on the conversational USB by Michelle Westerman herself.  Your client has attempted and lied about everything you sent me in that alleged letter of accusation and now you embarrassed yourself for trying to change legislation and put a protective order on me for being a mandatory reporter that has proven to the police that I am not lying or making her conditions up she has stated to me.

On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 7:37 AM CHRIS EIKENBERG <cavel...@gmail.com> wrote:

Judicial legislation is what made mandatory reporters mandatory.  Your protection orders are not for Roberta but for Lisa Lefehr which is obvious by the way that they are written trying to keep what she is doing to use her Hospice knowledge to purposely kill my mother without making it look like murder.  Knowing my mom has a heart condition and not following doctor ordered compression hose and to not walk on her leg or it will cause stroke unless she has that hose on which has not been provided but staff has purposely encouraged her to do so.  Or giving her medication that keeps her throwing up food morning, afternoon and evening when there is an alternative solution to help her keep the meds down but for 7 months and loss of 10 lbs is not implemented.  Nor allowing her treatment to go the hospital when she has thrown up and she admits it to ENT and fire man of the diarrhea and inability to keep fluid down and yet being denied transport to rehydrate her just because she has a piece of paper that she waves and states I can do what I want with your mom. While I stand in horror that she has no medical background, obviously is not working in the best interest of my mother through a "court order being a caregiver". My mom suffers through three days and she is really weak and unable to be herself because of the strain from failing to get her treatment.  There is no justification for the protection orders, just statements without evidence of any harm to ROBERTA.  Since Roberta is making these statements and under the Law of Colorado I am a Clergy, Surgical Tech and a caregiver, you can't have a judge go against the legislative judicial branch or committee that created mandatory reporting.  I would suggest you get a 101 refresher course about legislative issues versus having a court grant "not calling for help for an at risk adult by a mandatory reporter which you're trying to use a judge to order such".  

Section 19 of C.R.S.  under who is a mandatory reporter the fine they will face.   would be a good start for you.   She slept cold again for two nights and trying to place blame on a woman that has dementia for being cold when the room and central heating do not exist for her comfort is professional and business wise appalling.  She pays for heat to be in her room and comfort and is not provided that..  My  father has called APS regarding how you do not keep her room warm.  He bought the space heater which you approved, and you do not check on her.  I had to report it to non-emergency to do a well check.  Police officer Krenze stated itis the responsibility of the facility to provide heat in each room and took the report.  It is not her fault having dementia and Live to Assist is not a skilled nursing facility to ensure she stays warm, puts on warm clothes and keeps blankets on because you are not a skilled facility for her.  HE SUGGESTED THAT SHE BE MOVED TO A SKILLED NURSING FACILITY.  My father has asked she be moved  and is ignored and he wants to move in with her to take care of her and that is ignored because of the prejudice.,  Judge states he is too old, yet he has proof from Veterans hospital doctors his of sound mind and body and can make those medical decisions for his wife, and then that same judge states he can't be a guardian if he can't hear.  Because his hearing aids are two years old and being replaced??  Meaning all deaf people or impared people in her court are not counted able to take care of their family members.  WHAT A FAIR AGE DISCRIMINATORY ANDDISABLED PHOBIC JUDGE my mother has to go along with your illegal PO to protect the court ordered POS care giver who doesn't want to be held accountable for her actions and failures.

  As long as she is there eshe will be cold and sleep cold as there is no central air.  Furthermore since the "coo=guardian" is not doing anything to ensure she stays warm in your facility and she refuses to place her in the right one she will have to be checked on so she does not get pneumonia or sick due to the coldness of the room when she complains further.   Further attempts to state I have threatened anyone when I have never done so, just stated that I am a mandatory reporter and have to report what I hear and see, does not have limits of how often, and is not cause to attempt to keep me from my mother visitations that are set every Thursday.  Or when she calls asking I come by or by telephone that you attempt to limit her calls since Nov 27th 2023 via the co-guardians making yourselves unavailable for this at risk adult that depends on her family for mental health and vibrancy is now a ploy I suspect you are going to attempt to claim against me to keep me from seeing the conditions she calls me about.  I have never threatened anyone and that is stated on the conversational USB by Michelle Westerman herself.  Your client has attempted and lied about everything you sent me in that alleged letter of accusation and now you embarrassed yourself for trying to change legislation and put a protective order on me for being a mandatory reporter that has proven to the police that I am not lying or making her conditions up she has stated to me.

On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 7:00 PM Brooke Brestel <b...@brestellaw.com> wrote:

Hello,

You will find attached documents filed this evening regarding the request for additional protective orders at tomorrow's hearing.

Regards,

Brooke Brestel

[CHRIS EIKENBERG]

[CHRIS EIKENBERG]

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: CHRIS EIKENBERG <cavel...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 7:40 AM
Subject: Re: In re Roberta Green
To: Brooke Brestel <b...@brestellaw.com>, Modawar - CDPHE, Kristen <kristen...@state.co.us>, chris eikenberg <chrisei...@hotmail.com>, <ti...@kdvr.com>, <max.c...@thedenverchannel.com>, <tob...@gmail.com>, Kent Naughton <knau...@witwerlaw.com>, Pamela Halstead Williamson <spgtgu...@gmail.com>, <step...@sutherland-connor.com>

	7:37 AM (1 minute ago)
to Kristen, chris, tips, max.calise, Brooke

Judicial legislation is what made mandatory reporters mandatory.  Your protection orders are not for Roberta but for Lisa Lefehr which is obvious by the way that they are written trying to keep what she is doing to use her Hospice knowledge to purposely kill my mother without making it look like murder.  Knowing my mom has a heart condition and not following doctor ordered compression hose and to not walk on her leg or it will cause stroke unless she has that hose on which has not been provided but staff has purposely encouraged her to do so.  Or giving her medication that keeps her throwing up food morning, afternoon and evening when there is an alternative solution to help her keep the meds down but for 7 months and loss of 10 lbs is not implemented.  Nor allowing her treatment to go the hospital when she has thrown up and she admits it to ENT and fire man of the diarrhea and inability to keep fluid down and yet being denied transport to rehydrate her just because she has a piece of paper that she waves and states I can do what I want with your mom. While I stand in horror that she has no medical background, obviously is not working in the best interest of my mother through a "court order being a caregiver". My mom suffers through three days and she is really weak and unable to be herself because of the strain from failing to get her treatment.  There is no justification for the protection orders, just statements without evidence of any harm to ROBERTA.  Since Roberta is making these statements and under the Law of Colorado I am a Clergy, Surgical Tech and a caregiver, you can't have a judge go against the legislative judicial branch or committee that created mandatory reporting.  I would suggest you get a 101 refresher course about legislative issues versus having a court grant "not calling for help for an at risk adult by a mandatory reporter which you're trying to use a judge to order such".  

Section 19 of C.R.S.  under who is a mandatory reporter the fine they will face.   would be a good start for you.   She slept cold again for two nights and trying to place blame on a woman that has dementia for being cold when the room and central heating do not exist for her comfort is professional and business wise appalling.  She pays for heat to be in her room and comfort and is not provided that..  My  father has called APS regarding how you do not keep her room warm.  He bought the space heater which you approved, and you do not check on her.  I had to report it to non-emergency to do a well check.  Police officer Krenze stated itis the responsibility of the facility to provide heat in each room and took the report.  It is not her fault having dementia and Live to Assist is not a skilled nursing facility to ensure she stays warm, puts on warm clothes and keeps blankets on because you are not a skilled facility for her.  HE SUGGESTED THAT SHE BE MOVED TO A SKILLED NURSING FACILITY.  My father has asked she be moved  and is ignored and he wants to move in with her to take care of her and that is ignored because of the prejudice.,  Judge states he is too old, yet he has proof from Veterans hospital doctors his of sound mind and body and can make those medical decisions for his wife, and then that same judge states he can't be a guardian if he can't hear.  Because his hearing aids are two years old and being replaced??  Meaning all deaf people or impaired people in her court are not counted able to take care of their family members.  WHAT A FAIR AGE DISCRIMINATORY AND DISABLED PHOBIC JUDGE my mother has to go along with your illegal PO to protect the court ordered POS caregiver who doesn't want to be held accountable for her actions and failures.

  As long as she is there eshe will be cold and sleep cold as there is no central air.  Furthermore since the "coo=guardian" is not doing anything to ensure she stays warm in your facility and she refuses to place her in the right one she will have to be checked on so she does not get pneumonia or sick due to the coldness of the room when she complains further.   Further attempts to state I have threatened anyone when I have never done so, just stated that I am a mandatory reporter and have to report what I hear and see, does not have limits of how often, and is not cause to attempt to keep me from my mother visitations that are set every Thursday.  Or when she calls asking I come by or by telephone that you attempt to limit her calls since Nov 27th 2023 via the co-guardians making yourselves unavailable for this at risk adult that depends on her family for mental health and vibrancy is now a ploy I suspect you are going to attempt to claim against me to keep me from seeing the conditions she calls me about.  I have never threatened anyone and that is stated on the conversational USB by Michelle Westerman herself.  Your client has attempted and lied about everything you sent me in that alleged letter of accusation and now you embarrassed yourself for trying to change legislation and put a protective order on me for being a mandatory reporter that has proven to the police that I am not lying or making her conditions up she has stated to me.

On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 7:37 AM CHRIS EIKENBERG <cavel...@gmail.com> wrote:

Judicial legislation is what made mandatory reporters mandatory.  Your protection orders are not for Roberta but for Lisa Lefehr which is obvious by the way that they are written trying to keep what she is doing to use her Hospice knowledge to purposely kill my mother without making it look like murder.  Knowing my mom has a heart condition and not following doctor ordered compression hose and to not walk on her leg or it will cause stroke unless she has that hose on which has not been provided but staff has purposely encouraged her to do so.  Or giving her medication that keeps her throwing up food morning, afternoon and evening when there is an alternative solution to help her keep the meds down but for 7 months and loss of 10 lbs is not implemented.  Nor allowing her treatment to go the hospital when she has thrown up and she admits it to ENT and fire man of the diarrhea and inability to keep fluid down and yet being denied transport to rehydrate her just because she has a piece of paper that she waves and states I can do what I want with your mom. While I stand in horror that she has no medical background, obviously is not working in the best interest of my mother through a "court order being a caregiver". My mom suffers through three days and she is really weak and unable to be herself because of the strain from failing to get her treatment.  There is no justification for the protection orders, just statements without evidence of any harm to ROBERTA.  Since Roberta is making these statements and under the Law of Colorado I am a Clergy, Surgical Tech and a caregiver, you can't have a judge go against the legislative judicial branch or committee that created mandatory reporting.  I would suggest you get a 101 refresher course about legislative issues versus having a court grant "not calling for help for an at risk adult by a mandatory reporter which you're trying to use a judge to order such".  

Section 19 of C.R.S.  under who is a mandatory reporter the fine they will face.   would be a good start for you.   She slept cold again for two nights and trying to place blame on a woman that has dementia for being cold when the room and central heating do not exist for her comfort is professional and business wise appalling.  She pays for heat to be in her room and comfort and is not provided that..  My  father has called APS regarding how you do not keep her room warm.  He bought the space heater which you approved, and you do not check on her.  I had to report it to non-emergency to do a well check.  Police officer Krenze stated itis the responsibility of the facility to provide heat in each room and took the report.  It is not her fault having dementia and Live to Assist is not a skilled nursing facility to ensure she stays warm, puts on warm clothes and keeps blankets on because you are not a skilled facility for her.  HE SUGGESTED THAT SHE BE MOVED TO A SKILLED NURSING FACILITY.  My father has asked she be moved  and is ignored and he wants to move in with her to take care of her and that is ignored because of the prejudice.,  Judge states he is too old, yet he has proof from Veterans hospital doctors his of sound mind and body and can make those medical decisions for his wife, and then that same judge states he can't be a guardian if he can't hear.  Because his hearing aids are two years old and being replaced??  Meaning all deaf people or impared people in her court are not counted able to take care of their family members.  WHAT A FAIR AGE DISCRIMINATORY ANDDISABLED PHOBIC JUDGE my mother has to go along with your illegal PO to protect the court ordered POS care giver who doesn't want to be held accountable for her actions and failures.

  As long as she is there eshe will be cold and sleep cold as there is no central air.  Furthermore since the "coo=guardian" is not doing anything to ensure she stays warm in your facility and she refuses to place her in the right one she will have to be checked on so she does not get pneumonia or sick due to the coldness of the room when she complains further.   Further attempts to state I have threatened anyone when I have never done so, just stated that I am a mandatory reporter and have to report what I hear and see, does not have limits of how often, and is not cause to attempt to keep me from my mother visitations that are set every Thursday.  Or when she calls asking I come by or by telephone that you attempt to limit her calls since Nov 27th 2023 via the co-guardians making yourselves unavailable for this at risk adult that depends on her family for mental health and vibrancy is now a ploy I suspect you are going to attempt to claim against me to keep me from seeing the conditions she calls me about.  I have never threatened anyone and that is stated on the conversational USB by Michelle Westerman herself.  Your client has attempted and lied about everything you sent me in that alleged letter of accusation and now you embarrassed yourself for trying to change legislation and put a protective order on me for being a mandatory reporter that has proven to the police that I am not lying or making her conditions up she has stated to me.