Fwd: Earthworks investigation: fenceline monitoring fails to detect oil & gas emissions

6 views
Skip to first unread message

Lorenda Volker

unread,
Apr 17, 2023, 4:21:23 PM4/17/23
to John Kefalas, Kristin Stephens, Jody Shadduck-McNally
Commissioners, you were copied on this email at the bo...@larimer.org email address.  I'm forwarding it to you for your information.


Larimer County

Lorenda Volker

County Manager

Commissioners' Office

200 W Oak St, Fort Collins, 80522 | 2nd Floor

W: (970) 498-7008

lvo...@larimer.gov | www.larimer.gov



        

          


---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Doug Henderson <dhe...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 11:06 AM
Subject: Earthworks investigation: fenceline monitoring fails to detect oil & gas emissions
To: Lea Schneider <schn...@co.larimer.co.us>, Cassie Archuleta <carch...@fcgov.com>, Lesli Ellis <ell...@co.larimer.co.us>, Kirk Longstein <klong...@fcgov.com>, Emily Fischer <e...@rams.colostate.edu>, Mindy Hill - CSU CEJ <mindy...@colostate.edu>
Cc: Larimer Co Board of Commissioners <bo...@larimer.org>, Larimer Alliance for Health & Safety <larimer-...@googlegroups.com>, Fred Kirsch <cfors...@gmail.com>, Megan Thorburn <mega...@yahoo.com>, Cory Carroll <c...@drcorycarroll.com>, John McDonagh <johnam...@mac.com>, Will Walters <wi...@walters-consulting.com>, Warren Snyder <pregnan...@hotmail.com>, Kevin Cross <jkev...@comcast.net>, Emily Gallichotte <egalli...@gmail.com>, Fort Collins City Council <cityl...@fcgov.com>, Stephanie Malin <Stephan...@colostate.edu>


To all who want clean air --

An investigation of fenceline air quality monitoring systems at oil & gas sites found that fenceline monitoring almost completely failed to detect oil & gas emissions: "0 of the 22 OGI documented pollution events [documented by Earthworks field investigations] were detected by the CEMs [fenceline monitors] at surveyed sites." The report is here. A video for the report is here.

Four different fenceline monitors were used at the oil & gas sites investigated: "Fourteen sites had Project Canary-S monitors, five sites had SENSE-IT SPOD monitors, two sites had Aeroqual AQS-1 monitors and one site had SGS SmartSense monitors."

The air quality monitoring planned in Larimer County (funded by the EPA grant “Enhancing Monitoring of Air Toxics and Air Quality Education in Underserved Communities in Northern Colorado'') proposes to use SENSE-IT SPOD monitors -- the same kind that failed to detect pollution events in the investigation.

Will the planned fenceline monitoring perform adequately in Larimer County -- or will it fail to detect pollution events and give inaccurate data and false results?  

The collaborators involved in air quality monitoring planned in Larimer County should consider the real-world evidence that fenceline monitoring elsewhere has failed to detect oil & gas emissions -- and should take steps to avoid installing and replying on air quality monitoring technology which is known to fail and give false results.

Also, please note that the Sierra Club Poudre Canyon Group supported the grant proposal along with expressed concerns regarding the quality of monitoring and data:
For air quality monitoring data to be useful for achieving positive change in air quality and health-related impacts, the data needs to meet quality standards that ensure admissibility in administrative or judicial enforcement proceedings. For air quality and emissions data to be useful for enforcement, high-quality continuous concurrent meteorological data is also needed to correlate meteorological data with the emission data. Air quality data that proves inadequate for enforcement will be counter-productive; it will frustrate communities and other stakeholders that want positive change in air quality, possibly resulting in further erosion of public trust and increased public outrage directed at authorities including elected leaders; and result in failure to achieve positive change in air quality and health-related impacts, and the results expected in the RFA.
The Poudre Canyon Group's support letter is attached, for reference.

Respectfully,

Doug Henderson


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Earthworks and Oil Change International Report on Project Canary
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 08:18:12 -0600
From: Andrew Klooster <aklo...@earthworksaction.org>


Hey all, I have been indiciating for a while now to many of you that Earthworks has been working on a report on Project Canary and on the current fenceline air quality monitoring that occurs around drilling and fracking operations in Colorado.  Well that report is finally live!

What we found raises serious questions not just about Canary's business model but also about the efficacy of current operator designed and implemented air quality monitoring schemes. I conducted over 70 surveys of oil and gas facilities in the Front Range, filmed 22 pollution events, and in following up and digging into the monthly monitoring data found that not a single event was recorded by the fenceline monitors (many of which were Canary but some belonged to other brands). 

There is much more in the report itself so please feel free to ask me any questions after you have had a chance to review!


Also, here is a video for the report: https://youtu.be/fKiZmsxjxSA

And a post on Twitter if you use social media and would like to share: https://twitter.com/earthworks/status/1647955548988485632?s=46&t=bP9J-95rQl5mEszIzWNOtQ

--
=== Earthworks - Protecting communities and the environment

Andrew Klooster (he/his)
CO Field Advocate
Certified Optical Gas Imaging Thermographer
Certification #251862
(202) 887-1872 ext 143
Twitter: Earthworks
Facebook: earthworksaction

Combined Federal Campaign #41290, Member of EarthShare

Sierra Club Poudre Canyon Group cover letter 3.16.22.pdf
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages