FYI: PaaS comparisons

Michael Maximilien

unread,

Aug 27, 2014, 1:07:04 PM8/27/14

to vcap...@cloudfoundry.org, Federico Michele Facca

fyi...

An old research colleague of mine (on cc:) from Italy saw what James and I presented at CF summit this year w.r.t. PaaS comparison and forwarded this link to me that may be of interests to all of you, check it out: http://www.paasify.it/

Best,

dr.max

ibm clouds lab

silicon valley, ca

usa

mma...@pivotal.io

unread,

Aug 28, 2014, 2:44:03 PM8/28/14

to vcap...@cloudfoundry.org, federic...@create-net.org

Very cool. That should keep some Marketing folks busy...

MwM

Koper, Dies

unread,

Aug 28, 2014, 7:34:02 PM8/28/14

to vcap...@cloudfoundry.org

One thing I noticed standing out in this comparison is that most Cloud Foundry based aPaaS support auto-scaling, although that is not part of the OSS CF.

Rather than all CF adopters developing their own autoscaling solution (which end up looking pretty much the same anyway: monitoring CPU and memory metrics and invoking cf scale under the hood?), wouldn’t it make sense to contribute it to the OSS so that the CF adopters spend their effort on actual innovation?

I would also make CF look better in comparison with OpenShift and BeanStalk in lists like this, filling up a missing tick in a box.

Regards,

Dies Koper

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cloud Foundry Developers" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/cloudfoundry.org/d/msgid/vcap-dev/07cd9b20-094b-404b-86a2-cbc698e1e7d8%40cloudfoundry.org.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vcap-dev+u...@cloudfoundry.org.

Reply all

Reply to author

Forward