Re-basing warden on docker's libcontainer

[Glyn Normington]

This blog may be of interest: http://underlap.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/warden-meets-libcontainer.html

(Corresponding docker-dev thread: https://groups.google.com/d/topic/docker-dev/rR4R3Q5Quig/discussion)

[Abhi Hiremagalur]

Thank you for the excellent post Glyn. Exciting news!

I'd like to clarify one thing, with the exception of the warden-linux backend, should all the references to Warden say garden instead? Or are we expecting these changes to work with the Ruby based warden codebase as well?

Thanks

Abhi

On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 5:32 AM, Glyn Normington <gnorm...@gopivotal.com> wrote:

This blog may be of interest: http://underlap.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/warden-meets-libcontainer.html

(Corresponding docker-dev thread: https://groups.google.com/d/topic/docker-dev/rR4R3Q5Quig/discussion)

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cloud Foundry Developers" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/cloudfoundry.org/d/msgid/vcap-dev/66dd2808-5a7d-4861-bbf4-af8812a7039c%40cloudfoundry.org.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vcap-dev+u...@cloudfoundry.org.

[Glyn Normington]

I used the term generic "warden" since it's more familiar to those not acquainted with Diego.

The plan is to replace the go warden-linux backend and not touch the ruby stuff.

You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "Cloud Foundry Developers" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/cloudfoundry.org/d/msgid/vcap-dev/CABGMZaa_WXS%3DUY%2B%3DsXFVgT4ssMc%3DRksYi2nTp5MMAU3tUPXHdA%40mail.gmail.com.