Lucene 2.3.1 supports wildcard as the first character

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Andrea Westerinen

unread,
Mar 4, 2013, 2:03:32 PM3/4/13
to sta...@clarkparsia.com
But I still get an error with Stardog 1.1.3.

Can the next release use a later Lucene that allows this?

Andrea

Mike Grove

unread,
Mar 4, 2013, 2:27:37 PM3/4/13
to stardog
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Andrea Westerinen <arwest...@gmail.com> wrote:
But I still get an error with Stardog 1.1.3.

Can the next release use a later Lucene that allows this?

Stardog uses Lucene 4.0.0, which has been shipped with Stardog since v1.1.  Prior to that, we used several of the Lucene 3.x releases.  We've never supported or used Lucene 2.3.1.

Are you simply requesting that Stardog support wildcards as the leading character?  This is certainly something we could do for the next release, but as the Apache documentation [1] points out, it can be an expensive operation.  So while we can support it, there's not much we can do about its performance; you might see if there is another way to get the information you're looking for without resorting to a search that the Lucene folks deem to be too expensive to enable by default.

Cheers,

Mike

 


Andrea

--
-- --
You received this message because you are subscribed to the C&P "Stardog" group.
To post to this group, send email to sta...@clarkparsia.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
stardog+u...@clarkparsia.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/a/clarkparsia.com/group/stardog?hl=en
 
 

Andrea Westerinen

unread,
Mar 4, 2013, 4:17:19 PM3/4/13
to sta...@clarkparsia.com
Yes, our end customer REALLY wants to find items based on a string containing some sequence anywhere.

Yes, it is expensive, but when you can't find something, then you really need it.

Andrea

Kendall Clark

unread,
Mar 4, 2013, 4:32:34 PM3/4/13
to stardog
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Andrea Westerinen
<arwest...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, our end customer REALLY wants to find items based on a string
> containing some sequence anywhere.
>
> Yes, it is expensive, but when you can't find something, then you really
> need it.

This is simple: we will give users the ability to break their stuff
into pieces and then they get to keep all the broken pieces.

That is, no complaining that this slow thing is slow.

Cheers,
Kendall

Andrea Westerinen

unread,
Mar 4, 2013, 5:39:26 PM3/4/13
to sta...@clarkparsia.com
When do I complain? :-)

Andrea
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages