Official WebKit positions request filed here: Manifest Localization · Issue #627 · WebKit/standards-positions
I wanted to add additional context around not asking for a TAG review. The TAG has previously discussed the architectural problem of localizing strings in JSON‑based formats (w3ctag/design-reviews#178) and did not identify objections to structured localization approaches such as language maps. Manifest localization applies these established patterns and isn't a new architectural surface, which is why it did not require a separate TAG review.Best,Alex K.--On Tuesday, March 3, 2026 at 3:11:40 PM UTC-8 Alexander Kyereboah wrote:Contact emailsakyer...@microsoft.comSpecificationhttps://www.w3.org/TR/appmanifest/#x_localized-membersSummarySupports localization of manifest members so apps can adapt their names, descriptions, icons, and shortcuts to the user’s language and region. Developers provide localized values in the web app manifest, and the browser automatically selects the appropriate resources based on the user’s language settings, introducing language support across different markets.Blink componentBlink>AppManifestWeb Feature IDmanifest-localizationMotivationPWAs are used worldwide, but the web app manifest only supports a single language. This limits developers who want their apps to feel native and accessible to users across different regions. By allowing localization of manifest fields, developers can present app names, descriptions, icons, and shortcuts in the user’s preferred language, making web apps more accessible and inclusive.Initial public proposalNo information providedTAG reviewTAG review is not necessary because this feature implements behavior that is already fully specified in the Web App Manifest specification (*_localized members), with the architecture and localization model designed and reviewed in W3C (primarily via the Internationalization Working Group). Although Chromium may be an early or first implementation, this work does not introduce new web‑exposed capabilities, new architectural design choices, or new security or privacy properties. Given the lack of remaining architectural design space for TAG feedback to influence, TAG review would not add meaningful additional signal for this feature.TAG review statusNot applicableRisksInteroperability and CompatibilityNo information provided
Gecko: N/A (https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/1366)
WebKit: Positive (https://github.com/w3c/manifest/pull/1101) Support from @marcoscaceres on localization issue.
WebKit Bug: 276463 – Web App Manifest: localized member support
Web developers: Positive (https://github.com/w3c/manifest/pull/1101) @christianliebel filed the request as a web dev, with positive upvotes.
Other signals:WebView application risksDoes this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
No information providedDebuggabilityLocalized fields show up in the Application manifest, in line with existing manifest viewing capabilities.Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac, Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?YesIs this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests?Yes
PWA installation can't be automatically tested by WPT, manual WPT created at the following: https://wpt.live/appmanifest/icons_localized-member/
https://wpt.live/appmanifest/name_localized-member/
https://wpt.live/appmanifest/short_name_localized-member/
https://wpt.live/appmanifest/shortcuts_localized-member/
Automated unit tests at: https://source.chromium.org/chromium/chromium/src/+/main:third_party/blink/renderer/modules/manifest/manifest_parser_unittest.cc
https://source.chromium.org/chromium/chromium/src/+/main:chrome/browser/web_applications/jobs/manifest_to_web_app_install_info_job_unittest.ccFlag name on about://flagsNo information providedFinch feature nameWebAppManifestLocalizationRollout planWill ship enabled for all usersRequires code in //chrome?FalseTracking bughttps://issues.chromium.org/issues/380491647Estimated milestones
Shipping on desktop
147Anticipated spec changesOpen questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
No information providedLink to entry on the Chrome Platform Statushttps://chromestatus.com/feature/5090807862394880?gate=4864426712891392Links to previous Intent discussionsIntent to Prototype: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/17f99c87-4953-4c9e-a767-f0fb2f7617ban%40chromium.orgThis intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/f365d318-706d-4eaa-82e5-ae71ad765ef3n%40chromium.org.