[AGENDA] MessageFormat 2025-04-28

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Addison Phillips

unread,
Apr 25, 2025, 3:15:19 PMApr 25
to Message Format Working Group

All,

The agenda for the 28 April 2025 MessageFormat WG teleconference has been updated.

You can find it here:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/18ac37Vk2-DTTdQkY-ia15gYdd0-XMij6VrhLiBNGXgk/edit

(The agenda is always mirrored at this page)

This is a regular teleconference.

Behold the agenda:


Topic: Info Share, Project Planning



Topic: PR Review

Timeboxed review of items ready for merge.


PR

Description

Recommendation

#1071

Currency and unit conformance

Discuss

#1070

Allow clamping of digit size options

Discuss, Merge?

#1068

Design document for percent formatting

Discuss

#1067

Semantic skeletons design

Discuss

#1065

Draft new charter and goals for v49/v50 and beyond

Discuss






Topic: Semantic Skeletons

Reserving time to discuss the design. Some progress has been made and more is needed.


https://github.com/unicode-org/message-format-wg/pull/1067 

https://github.com/unicode-org/message-format-wg/pull/1067/files?short_path=ee0a5f2#diff-ee0a5f2b733a9fdd85ab9880271f9f036decc3910f560655df115e939ed168e4



Topic: Percent Formatting (#956)

Reserving time to discuss whether to go with `:percent` or whether to use `:unit unit=percent` and how to handle percents if unscaled.



Topic: Issue review

https://github.com/unicode-org/message-format-wg/issues

Currently we have 30 open (was 31 last time).

  • 20 are tagged for 48

  • 3 are tagged “Future”

  • 2 are PR needed and in need of a PR

  • 13 are Preview-Feedback

  • 2 are tagged Feedback

  • 1 is resolve-candidate and proposed for close.

  • 3 are Agenda+ and proposed for discussion (see below)

  • 0 are ballots


Issue

Description

Recommendation

#1051

Plans for v48

Discuss

#978

Interop concerns and normative-optional features

Discuss

#866

Semantic date/time skeletons

PR design in progress

-- 
Addison Phillips
Chair (W3C I18N WG, MessageFormat WG)

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages