[AGENDA] MessageFormat 2025-06-02

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Addison Phillips

unread,
Jun 1, 2025, 10:30:13 AMJun 1
to Message Format Working Group

All,

At long last... the agenda for the 2025-06-02 MessageFormat Working Group teleconference has been updated.

Note that we have an open ballot (if you have not already done so, please vote ***NOW***):

You can find it here:

Behold the agenda:

Topic: Info Share, Project Planning


Topic: PR Review

Timeboxed review of items ready for merge.


PR

Description

Recommendation

#1068

Design document for percent formatting

Merge

#1067

Semantic skeletons design

Discuss

#1065

Draft new charter and goals for v49/v50 and beyond

Discuss, Agenda+



Topic: Working Group Charter and Goals

The proposed working group charter and proposed goals have been available for a few weeks. Having completed a ballot, let’s resolve any issues and submit to the TC.


Topic: Percent Formatting (#1068)

Not having achieved consensus previously, let’s discuss the options or proceed to a ballot. In the previous calls we reintroduced `style=percent`. Some delegates do not want `:integer` to include `style=percent`. It’s unclear if `:unit unit=percent` has consensus support or not. We have not yet established a clear split-vs-lump policy or criteria for functions, so `:percent` might still be a possibility.




Topic: Semantic Skeletons

Let’s discuss next steps in completing the design.


https://github.com/unicode-org/message-format-wg/pull/1067   


Topic: Issue review

https://github.com/unicode-org/message-format-wg/issues

Currently we have 27 open (was 26 last time).

  • 17 are tagged for 48

  • 3 are tagged “Future”

  • 10 are Preview-Feedback

  • 2 are tagged Feedback

  • 2 are resolve-candidate and proposed for close.

  • 4 are Agenda+ and proposed for discussion (see below)

  • 2 are PR-Needed and need a pull request

  • 1 is a ballot (!!)


Issue

Description

Recommendation

#866

CLDR semantic datetime skeleton spec is nearly ready and MF2 should use it

Discuss

#978

Interoperability concerns and normative-optional features

Discuss

#1051

Plans for v48

Close?

#1074

[^BALLOT^] Approve the new MFWG charter

Discuss


-- 
Addison Phillips
Chair (W3C I18N WG, MessageFormat WG)

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages