Blink: Log blob: navigations under Trusted Types (metrics‑only; no behavior change) [chromium/src : main]

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Rick Byers (Gerrit)

unread,
Sep 12, 2025, 10:24:59 AM (8 days ago) Sep 12
to David Amber “WebDUH LLC” Weatherspoon, Camille Lamy, AyeAye, Chromium Metrics Reviews, chromium...@chromium.org, gavinp...@chromium.org, asvitkine...@chromium.org, blink-...@chromium.org, loading...@chromium.org
Attention needed from Camille Lamy and David Amber “WebDUH LLC” Weatherspoon

Rick Byers voted and added 2 comments

Votes added by Rick Byers

Code-Review-1

2 comments

Patchset-level comments
File-level comment, Patchset 6 (Latest):
Rick Byers . resolved

While other CLs from this account remain in violation of our AI policy (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6868239), I suggest no time be spent reviewing additional CLs. Please get to a

File content/common/features.h
Line 180, Patchset 6 (Latest):CONTENT_EXPORT BASE_DECLARE_FEATURE(kTrustedTypesBlobNavigationEnforcement);
Rick Byers . unresolved

If this CL is just about adding metrics, why does it include a feature for "enforcement"?

This looks to me like a 3rd violation of our AI policy (other two being in this CL: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6868239).

Can you explain how this happened?

Open in Gerrit

Related details

Attention is currently required from:
  • Camille Lamy
  • David Amber “WebDUH LLC” Weatherspoon
Submit Requirements:
  • requirement satisfiedCode-Coverage
  • requirement is not satisfiedCode-Owners
  • requirement is blockingCode-Review
  • requirement is not satisfiedNo-Unresolved-Comments
Inspect html for hidden footers to help with email filtering. To unsubscribe visit settings. DiffyGerrit
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: chromium/src
Gerrit-Branch: main
Gerrit-Change-Id: I4d87f9564f2bf4b4afbd6c2c59c1aec5e326797b
Gerrit-Change-Number: 6879190
Gerrit-PatchSet: 6
Gerrit-Owner: David Amber “WebDUH LLC” Weatherspoon <reconsume...@gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Rick Byers <rby...@chromium.org>
Gerrit-CC: Camille Lamy <cl...@chromium.org>
Gerrit-CC: Chromium Metrics Reviews <chromium-met...@google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: David Amber “WebDUH LLC” Weatherspoon <reconsume...@gmail.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Camille Lamy <cl...@chromium.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 14:24:54 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
satisfied_requirement
unsatisfied_requirement
blocking_requirement
open
diffy

David Amber “WebDUH LLC” Weatherspoon (Gerrit)

unread,
Sep 12, 2025, 10:27:29 AM (8 days ago) Sep 12
to Rick Byers, Camille Lamy, AyeAye, Chromium Metrics Reviews, chromium...@chromium.org, gavinp...@chromium.org, asvitkine...@chromium.org, blink-...@chromium.org, loading...@chromium.org
Attention needed from Camille Lamy and Rick Byers

David Amber “WebDUH LLC” Weatherspoon added 1 comment

File content/common/features.h
Line 180, Patchset 6 (Latest):CONTENT_EXPORT BASE_DECLARE_FEATURE(kTrustedTypesBlobNavigationEnforcement);
Rick Byers . unresolved

If this CL is just about adding metrics, why does it include a feature for "enforcement"?

This looks to me like a 3rd violation of our AI policy (other two being in this CL: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6868239).

Can you explain how this happened?

David Amber “WebDUH LLC” Weatherspoon

Yes - developed it out fully locally for expirementation and then regressed it to metrics to ensure it would be valid if moved forwarard - I am having issues with Gerry still!

Open in Gerrit

Related details

Attention is currently required from:
  • Camille Lamy
  • Rick Byers
Submit Requirements:
  • requirement satisfiedCode-Coverage
  • requirement is not satisfiedCode-Owners
  • requirement is blockingCode-Review
  • requirement is not satisfiedNo-Unresolved-Comments
Inspect html for hidden footers to help with email filtering. To unsubscribe visit settings. DiffyGerrit
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: chromium/src
Gerrit-Branch: main
Gerrit-Change-Id: I4d87f9564f2bf4b4afbd6c2c59c1aec5e326797b
Gerrit-Change-Number: 6879190
Gerrit-PatchSet: 6
Gerrit-Owner: David Amber “WebDUH LLC” Weatherspoon <reconsume...@gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Rick Byers <rby...@chromium.org>
Gerrit-CC: Camille Lamy <cl...@chromium.org>
Gerrit-CC: Chromium Metrics Reviews <chromium-met...@google.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Camille Lamy <cl...@chromium.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Rick Byers <rby...@chromium.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 14:27:24 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Rick Byers <rby...@chromium.org>
satisfied_requirement
unsatisfied_requirement
blocking_requirement
open
diffy

David Amber “WebDUH LLC” Weatherspoon (Gerrit)

unread,
Sep 12, 2025, 10:29:01 AM (8 days ago) Sep 12
to Rick Byers, Camille Lamy, AyeAye, Chromium Metrics Reviews, chromium...@chromium.org, gavinp...@chromium.org, asvitkine...@chromium.org, blink-...@chromium.org, loading...@chromium.org
Attention needed from Camille Lamy and Rick Byers

David Amber “WebDUH LLC” Weatherspoon added 1 comment

File content/common/features.h
Line 180, Patchset 6 (Latest):CONTENT_EXPORT BASE_DECLARE_FEATURE(kTrustedTypesBlobNavigationEnforcement);
Rick Byers . unresolved

If this CL is just about adding metrics, why does it include a feature for "enforcement"?

This looks to me like a 3rd violation of our AI policy (other two being in this CL: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6868239).

Can you explain how this happened?

David Amber “WebDUH LLC” Weatherspoon

Yes - developed it out fully locally for expirementation and then regressed it to metrics to ensure it would be valid if moved forwarard - I am having issues with Gerry still!

David Amber “WebDUH LLC” Weatherspoon

I was trying to acheive what was asked by the person you put in charge of me in the original cli so I filed the bugs she requested and am attempting to post just the metrics version only within the blink scope.

Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 14:28:57 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: David Amber “WebDUH LLC” Weatherspoon <reconsume...@gmail.com>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Rick Byers <rby...@chromium.org>
satisfied_requirement
unsatisfied_requirement
blocking_requirement
open
diffy

Rick Byers (Gerrit)

unread,
Sep 12, 2025, 10:31:18 AM (8 days ago) Sep 12
to David Amber “WebDUH LLC” Weatherspoon, Camille Lamy, AyeAye, Chromium Metrics Reviews, chromium...@chromium.org, gavinp...@chromium.org, asvitkine...@chromium.org, blink-...@chromium.org, loading...@chromium.org
Attention needed from Camille Lamy and David Amber “WebDUH LLC” Weatherspoon

Rick Byers added 1 comment

File content/common/features.h
Line 180, Patchset 6 (Latest):CONTENT_EXPORT BASE_DECLARE_FEATURE(kTrustedTypesBlobNavigationEnforcement);
Rick Byers . unresolved

If this CL is just about adding metrics, why does it include a feature for "enforcement"?

This looks to me like a 3rd violation of our AI policy (other two being in this CL: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6868239).

Can you explain how this happened?

David Amber “WebDUH LLC” Weatherspoon

Yes - developed it out fully locally for expirementation and then regressed it to metrics to ensure it would be valid if moved forwarard - I am having issues with Gerry still!

Rick Byers

Ok. You can mark a patch as "work in progress" in the gerrit UI and not add any reviewers while you are developing it. We expect contributors to carefully review each and every line of their CL and make sure they make sense within the context of their CL description before asking anyone else to spend their time looking at the CL. I'll remove reviewers for now. Once you have confidence in the quality, completeness and self-consistency of your CL then an expert can invest their time reviewing it.

Open in Gerrit

Related details

Attention is currently required from:
  • Camille Lamy
  • David Amber “WebDUH LLC” Weatherspoon
Submit Requirements:
  • requirement satisfiedCode-Coverage
  • requirement is not satisfiedCode-Owners
  • requirement is blockingCode-Review
  • requirement is not satisfiedNo-Unresolved-Comments
Inspect html for hidden footers to help with email filtering. To unsubscribe visit settings. DiffyGerrit
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: chromium/src
Gerrit-Branch: main
Gerrit-Change-Id: I4d87f9564f2bf4b4afbd6c2c59c1aec5e326797b
Gerrit-Change-Number: 6879190
Gerrit-PatchSet: 6
Gerrit-Owner: David Amber “WebDUH LLC” Weatherspoon <reconsume...@gmail.com>
Gerrit-CC: Camille Lamy <cl...@chromium.org>
Gerrit-CC: Chromium Metrics Reviews <chromium-met...@google.com>
Gerrit-CC: Rick Byers <rby...@chromium.org>
Gerrit-Attention: David Amber “WebDUH LLC” Weatherspoon <reconsume...@gmail.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Camille Lamy <cl...@chromium.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 14:31:13 +0000
satisfied_requirement
unsatisfied_requirement
blocking_requirement
open
diffy

David Amber “WebDUH LLC” Weatherspoon (Gerrit)

unread,
Sep 12, 2025, 10:32:52 AM (8 days ago) Sep 12
to Rick Byers, Camille Lamy, AyeAye, Chromium Metrics Reviews, chromium...@chromium.org, gavinp...@chromium.org, asvitkine...@chromium.org, blink-...@chromium.org, loading...@chromium.org
Attention needed from Camille Lamy and David Amber “WebDUH LLC” Weatherspoon

David Amber “WebDUH LLC” Weatherspoon added 1 comment

Message

Thank you and I apologize I promise I am working very hard on it it's mostly I am not used to Gerritt

Attention needed from Camille Lamy and David Amber “WebDUH LLC” Weatherspoon Line 180, Patchset 6 (Latest):

. Open in Gerrit

Attention is currently required from:

Submit Requirements: hidden footers settings

Gerrit-MessageType: comment

Gerrit-Project: chromium/src

Gerrit-Branch: main

Gerrit-Change-Id: I4d87f9564f2bf4b4afbd6c2c59c1aec5e326797b

Gerrit-Change-Number: 6879190

Gerrit-PatchSet: 6

Gerrit-Owner: David Amber “WebDUH LLC” Weatherspoon <reconsume...@gmail.com>

Gerrit-CC: AyeAye <android-bu...@system.gserviceaccount.com>

Gerrit-CC: Camille Lamy <cl...@chromium.org>

Gerrit-CC: Chromium Metrics Reviews <chromium-met...@google.com>

Gerrit-CC: Rick Byers <rby...@chromium.org>

Gerrit-CC: chromium...@chromium.org

Gerrit-Attention: David Amber “WebDUH LLC” Weatherspoon <reconsume...@gmail.com>

Gerrit-Attention: Camille Lamy <cl...@chromium.org>

Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 14:31:13 +0000

Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Gerrit-Has-Labels: No

Comment-In-Reply-To: David Amber “WebDUH LLC” Weatherspoon <reconsume...@gmail.com>

Comment-In-Reply-To: Rick Byers <rby...@chromium.org>

1 comment

Patchset-level comments
David Amber “WebDUH LLC” Weatherspoon . resolved

Thank you and I apologize I promise I am working very hard on it it's mostly I am not used to Gerritt

Attention needed from Camille Lamy and David Amber “WebDUH LLC” Weatherspoon Line 180, Patchset 6 (Latest):

. Open in Gerrit

Attention is currently required from:

Submit Requirements: hidden footers settings

Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 14:32:42 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
satisfied_requirement
unsatisfied_requirement
blocking_requirement
open
diffy

David Amber “WebDUH LLC” Weatherspoon (Gerrit)

unread,
Sep 12, 2025, 10:37:56 AM (8 days ago) Sep 12
to Rick Byers, Camille Lamy, AyeAye, Chromium Metrics Reviews, chromium...@chromium.org, gavinp...@chromium.org, asvitkine...@chromium.org, blink-...@chromium.org, loading...@chromium.org

David Amber “WebDUH LLC” Weatherspoon added 1 comment

Message

I really hope you can tell from what was included how hoard I Am working on it it - I built it out several different ways ensuring I Would have a plan of action for whatever decisions the code owners make and I regressed several versions -> it was actually not producing any errors at all for me so much so I didn't notice I hadn't removed the obviously not supposed to be in there yet files. I am still learning gerritt and I Will make you proud!

On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 10:32 AM David Amber Weatherspoon <> wrote:

1 comment

Patchset-level comments
David Amber “WebDUH LLC” Weatherspoon . resolved

I really hope you can tell from what was included how hoard I Am working on it it - I built it out several different ways ensuring I Would have a plan of action for whatever decisions the code owners make and I regressed several versions -> it was actually not producing any errors at all for me so much so I didn't notice I hadn't removed the obviously not supposed to be in there yet files. I am still learning gerritt and I Will make you proud!

On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 10:32 AM David Amber Weatherspoon <> wrote:

Open in Gerrit

Related details

Attention set is empty
Submit Requirements:
  • requirement satisfiedCode-Coverage
  • requirement is not satisfiedCode-Owners
  • requirement is blockingCode-Review
  • requirement is not satisfiedNo-Unresolved-Comments
Inspect html for hidden footers to help with email filtering. To unsubscribe visit settings. DiffyGerrit
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: chromium/src
Gerrit-Branch: main
Gerrit-Change-Id: I4d87f9564f2bf4b4afbd6c2c59c1aec5e326797b
Gerrit-Change-Number: 6879190
Gerrit-PatchSet: 6
Gerrit-Owner: David Amber “WebDUH LLC” Weatherspoon <reconsume...@gmail.com>
Gerrit-CC: Camille Lamy <cl...@chromium.org>
Gerrit-CC: Chromium Metrics Reviews <chromium-met...@google.com>
Gerrit-CC: Rick Byers <rby...@chromium.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 14:37:42 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
satisfied_requirement
unsatisfied_requirement
blocking_requirement
open
diffy
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages