I'm looking at
https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=429025 which is about CQ coverage for chromium.chromiumos waterfall.
Do we consider that in scope for the code yellow? AFAICT chromium.chromiumos is not on
build.chromium.org, so it's probably not "main waterfall".
For now the bots have only been added to the tryserver, which I think is fine - it sounds reasonable to provide optional tryserver coverage for any buildbot master we have. *_ng bots actually make this super-easy (see
https://codereview.chromium.org/691293002).
I'm not sure however if we should proceed with adding the new builders to the CQ. Even if we have some capacity on Linux now, I'd prefer to keep the option of kicking out non-essential builders when we do need it.
Paweł