[TDR] Remove TODOs linked to issue 40551225 [chromium/src : main]
Valeria Jankowskaja (Gerrit)
Message from Valeria Jankowskaja![]( "Open in Gerrit")
Set Ready For Review
Related details
- Max Morin
Code-Coverage
Code-Owners
Code-Review
Review-Enforcement
| Inspect html for hidden footers to help with email filtering. To unsubscribe visit settings. |
Valeria Jankowskaja (Gerrit)
Message from Valeria Jankowskaja![]( "Open in Gerrit")
The detailed analysis basing on the http://google3/wireless/android/pdeio/appliedai/agents/adk_agents/todo_removal_agent/system_prompt.xml framework:
1. **Intent Classification:** The TODO comment is `// TODO(crbug.com/40551225): Don't propagate errors if we can retry instead.` This requests the addition of new logic (automatic retries), which corresponds to **Intent B: Code Addition**.
2. **Verification Rules:** The associated bug, crbug.com/40551225, is marked as **OBSOLETE**. The verification rule for Intent B with an obsolete bug requires confirming that the planned work was intentionally abandoned.
3. **Evidence Analysis:** A comment in the bug history from 2020-09-03 provides explicit evidence of this abandonment. The comment states: *"We decided that this is better left to the applications since different applications would benefit from different policies. The application receives events when the audio process crashes and can use these to restart streams following any policy it likes."* This clearly indicates a design decision to not implement the retry logic in the browser and instead delegate this responsibility to the client application. This establishes a **preliminary conclusion of REMOVABLE**.
4. **Final Checks:**
- **The "Read-Only" Constraint:** This check passes. The current code propagates the error, and removing the TODO comment does not necessitate any further code changes.
- **Documentation Value:** This check is triggered. The TODO comment is misleading because it presents an abandoned task as pending. However, the reason *why* the error is propagated instead of being retried is valuable context for future developers. Removing the comment entirely would lose this context. This triggers the context checks.
- **The Obsolete Means Abandoned:** This check passes. The reasoning is based on the explicit comment in the bug, not solely on the 'OBSOLETE' status.
- **Creates New Work:** This check passes. No new work is created by removing the TODO.
- **CL Loophole:** This check passes. The CL that added the TODO (https://crrev.com/c/1047209) is not being used as evidence for its removal.
5. **Context Checks:** Since the 'Documentation Value' check was triggered, a context check is required. The TODO comment itself is no longer a valid action item, but the underlying design decision it alludes to is important for understanding the code. The best course of action is to rephrase the TODO into a permanent comment that explains that error propagation is intentional and that clients are responsible for retries.
Based on this analysis, the final conclusion is that the TODO is REPHRASABLE.
Related details
- Max Morin
Code-Coverage
Code-Owners
Code-Review
Review-Enforcement
| Inspect html for hidden footers to help with email filtering. To unsubscribe visit settings. |
Valeria Jankowskaja (Gerrit)
Message from Valeria Jankowskaja![]( "Open in Gerrit")
The change needs two +1s. Reviewers:
- maxm...@chromium.org was selected as reviewer because they are assignee of b/40551225.
Related details
- Max Morin
Code-Coverage
Code-Owners
Code-Review
Review-Enforcement
| Inspect html for hidden footers to help with email filtering. To unsubscribe visit settings. |
Max Morin (Gerrit)
Max Morin added 1 comment![]( "Open in Gerrit")
- Valeria Jankowskaja
Code-Coverage
Code-Owners
Code-Review
Review-Enforcement
| Inspect html for hidden footers to help with email filtering. To unsubscribe visit settings. |
Tomasz Lichoń (Gerrit)
Message from Tomasz Lichoń![]( "Open in Gerrit")
- Max Morin
Code-Coverage
Code-Owners
Code-Review
Review-Enforcement
| Inspect html for hidden footers to help with email filtering. To unsubscribe visit settings. |
Max Morin (Gerrit)
Max Morin added 1 comment![]( "Open in Gerrit")
- Tomasz Lichoń
Code-Coverage
Code-Owners
Code-Review
Review-Enforcement
| Inspect html for hidden footers to help with email filtering. To unsubscribe visit settings. |
Tove Petersson (Gerrit)
Tove Petersson voted Code-Review+1![]( "Open in Gerrit")
- Valeria Jankowskaja
Code-Coverage
Code-Owners
Code-Review
Review-Enforcement
| Inspect html for hidden footers to help with email filtering. To unsubscribe visit settings. |