Reland "Enable Empty Process Reuse and Process-Per-Site Main Frame Threshold by default" [chromium/src : main]

0 views

Skip to first unread message

Alex Attar (Gerrit)

unread,

Jan 30, 2026, 5:34:46 PM (7 hours ago) Jan 30

to AyeAye, Alex Moshchuk, Chromium LUCI CQ, chromium...@chromium.org, Hiroki Nakagawa, chromium-a...@chromium.org, extension...@chromium.org, kinuko+ser...@chromium.org, kinuko...@chromium.org, shimazu+se...@chromium.org, blink-work...@chromium.org, servicewor...@chromium.org, horo+...@chromium.org

Attention needed from Alex Moshchuk

Alex Attar voted and added 1 comment

Votes added by Alex Attar

Auto-Submit	+1
Commit-Queue	+1

1 comment

Patchset-level comments

File-level comment, Patchset 5 (Latest):

Alex Attar . resolved

PTAL,
Thanks

Open in Gerrit

Related details

Attention is currently required from:

Alex Moshchuk

Submit Requirements:

Code-Coverage
Code-Owners
Code-Review
Review-Enforcement

Inspect html for hidden footers to help with email filtering. To unsubscribe visit settings.

Gerrit

satisfied_requirement

unsatisfied_requirement

open

diffy

Alex Moshchuk (Gerrit)

unread,

Jan 30, 2026, 9:23:09 PM (3 hours ago) Jan 30

to Alex Attar, AyeAye, Chromium LUCI CQ, chromium...@chromium.org, Hiroki Nakagawa, chromium-a...@chromium.org, extension...@chromium.org, kinuko+ser...@chromium.org, kinuko...@chromium.org, shimazu+se...@chromium.org, blink-work...@chromium.org, servicewor...@chromium.org, horo+...@chromium.org

Attention needed from Alex Attar

Alex Moshchuk voted and added 2 comments

Votes added by Alex Moshchuk

Code-Review

2 comments

Patchset-level comments

File-level comment, Patchset 5 (Latest):

Alex Moshchuk . resolved

LGTM

File chrome/browser/extensions/api/web_navigation/web_navigation_apitest.cc

Line 526, Patchset 5 (Latest): features::kProcessPerSiteUpToMainFrameThreshold);

Alex Moshchuk . unresolved

Weird, I wouldn't expect this test to depend on process reuse on first glance. Did it fail because the processId was off in the results? Might be worth clarifying in the comment here.