cxx

sgtm me too since we have a thread for addressing existing base::Contains() usage. On Thu, Jan 8,

> Does std::vector<int> v = std::ranges::to(...) work? That's less verbose. No,

On Saturday, December 27, 2025 at 3:26:20 AM UTC+1 Adam Rice wrote: I'm in favour of changing to

+1, thanks! Daniel On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 at 10:31, 'Avi Drissman' via cxx <c...@chromium.org

> At a glance, that one might actually be fine with the .*, though adding a test is probably

I went ahead and lg'd the CL, since this looks very uncontroversial :) On Tue, Jan 6, 2026 at 10:

If Chromium were to decide that it's a priority, we could make them supported. If MSVC can do it,

FYI, I have a patch in review to convert SystemMemoryInfo to use ByteSize instead of ByteCount. I

Re compile size: the compile size builder isn't using modules and there are folks very actively

Thanks for the input. The reference to Member<T> garbage_collected; has been dropped in

As of crrev.com/1519103, the JSONReader helpers no longer default to `JSON_PARSE_CHROMIUM_EXTENSIONS`

I ended up refactoring my tests to use absl::flat_hash_map anyway, just because they were simpler

But we don't do that. We use style=chromium. I disagree that we are beholden to the clang-format

Thanks, everything is working as intended then. I was just confused by the UI. On Tue, Sep 2, 2025 at

Hi, Some thoughts: C++ Memory: Slide 6 "C++ is extremely low level.". I would probably say

For Chrome, the most relevant problems are that they are quite hard for the compiler to optimize, and

The last few instances of base::Passed() are difficult to remove. I've poked at some slowly, but

Hi, for the ease of writing a long message, let me reply here. I am not the original author. As you

Hi Julia, I've given you edit access to the original tracking doc if you'd like to update it

The base containers readme is the guidance that I updated. I also sent a change to update DEPS files

Hello everyone I wrote an extension to update chromium active-tab title back color (not the page) The

On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 at 17:13, Peter Kasting <pkas...@chromium.org> wrote: On Tue, Apr 8, 2025,

You're right that the part of the test run twice is basically wasted time. Browser A can't do

I looked at a handful of the items on the list, and I would not characterise them as "not

On Tuesday, January 21, 2025 at 11:17:08 AM UTC-8 Peter Kasting wrote: Update, mostly for my own

Makes sense. I'll add a comment to weak_ptr.h about why they're not supported On Fri, Mar 14,

Yay! On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 7:58 AM Nico Weber <tha...@chromium.org> wrote: Closure: https://

thank you all for solving it, are we good to continue? Avi Drissman schrieb am Freitag, 28. Februar

Just to add: we do toolchain testing with asserts enabled, so tripping an assert would break that

If you have that template somewhere, we should link up resources at some point :) I put together