Hi ct-policy@,
We are inviting applications for the inclusion of 2027 log shards. Both RFC6962 and static-ct-api logs are welcome.
To ensure adequate time for compliance monitoring, rollout, and processing, please submit 2027 log shards no later than August 1, 2025. We can not guarantee that logs submitted after that date will reach Usable status (even if passing compliance monitoring) before certificates needing those logs are issued. Shards submitted after August 1 will still be evaluated for inclusion, but delayed include results in reduced redundancy and certificate issuance capacity for the entire WebPKI until those late logs are usable.
Two additional notes:
If you are an operator of an existing Qualified or Usable log in Chrome's log list and you are not planning on running a 2027 log shard, we would appreciate a heads-up as soon as possible so that we can plan accordingly.
As of now, Chrome has only received an inclusion application for static-ct-api logs from a single operator, and so the robustness of static-ct-api log implementations remains unproven. As a result, we ask (but are not requiring) operators with existing Qualified or Usable RFC6962 logs to offer RFC6962-compliant shards for at least 2027H1.
The log policy provides additional instructions on how to apply for inclusion, but as always, please reach out with any questions.
Joe, on behalf of the Chrome CT team
--You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Certificate Transparency Policy" group.To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ct-policy+...@chromium.org.
Hi,> As of now, Chrome has only received an inclusion application for static-ct-api logs from a single operator, and so the robustness of static-ct-api log implementations remains unproven. As a result, we ask (but are not requiring) operators with existing Qualified or Usable RFC6962 logs to offer RFC6962-compliant shards for at least 2027H1.Is it planned to completely retire RFC6962 long-term, essentially making it obsolete?
--
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/ct-policy/ee166779-709e-49ff-b14d-49800cd1c06bn%40chromium.org.