| Auto-Submit | +1 |
@dcheng, can you PTAL? /cc @mfarazma - this is a follow-up to the comment left at https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7050763/8#message-97d1f8c87b95752277b9179b102a9a08f4dc5401
| Inspect html for hidden footers to help with email filtering. To unsubscribe visit settings. |
| Inspect html for hidden footers to help with email filtering. To unsubscribe visit settings. |
@dcheng, can you PTAL? /cc @mfarazma - this is a follow-up to the comment left at https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7050763/8#message-97d1f8c87b95752277b9179b102a9a08f4dc5401
Thank you for your help.
| Inspect html for hidden footers to help with email filtering. To unsubscribe visit settings. |
[rust] Cover `rustc_nightly_capability` via `buildflag_header`.
https://crrev.com/c/7050763 accidentally removed `rustflags += [
"--cfg=rust_allocator_no_nightly_capability" ]` without replacing it
with a `buildflag_header` equivalent. This CL fixes this.
| Inspect html for hidden footers to help with email filtering. To unsubscribe visit settings. |
LUCI Bisection has identified this change as the culprit of a build failure. See the analysis: https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/chromium/bisection/compile-analysis/b/8692747594532272513
A revert for this change was not created because the builder that this CL broke is not watched by gardeners, therefore less important. You can consider revert this CL, fix forward or let builder owners resolve it themselves.
Sample failed build: https://ci.chromium.org/b/8692747594532272513
If this is a false positive, please report it at http://b.corp.google.com/createIssue?component=1199205&description=Analysis%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fchromium-review.googlesource.com%2Fc%2Fchromium%2Fsrc%2F%2B%2F7465178&format=PLAIN&priority=P3&title=Wrongly+blamed+https%3A%2F%2Fci.chromium.org%2Fui%2Fp%2Fchromium%2Fbisection%2Fcompile-analysis%2Fb%2F8692747594532272513&type=BUG
| Inspect html for hidden footers to help with email filtering. To unsubscribe visit settings. |
| Inspect html for hidden footers to help with email filtering. To unsubscribe visit settings. |
Hi Łukasz,
This CL was reverted but even applying it on a ppc64 machine still failed our builds. I thought maybe your condition was wrong and had to be negated with:
```
"RUST_ALLOCATOR_NO_NIGHTLY_CAPABILITY=!$rustc_nightly_capability",
```
But even this still failed our build. Is it possible to re add what was previously working for now since it takes time for it to propagate back to V8:
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7467869
| Inspect html for hidden footers to help with email filtering. To unsubscribe visit settings. |
Hi Łukasz,
This CL was reverted but even applying it on a ppc64 machine still failed our builds. I thought maybe your condition was wrong and had to be negated with:
```
"RUST_ALLOCATOR_NO_NIGHTLY_CAPABILITY=!$rustc_nightly_capability",
```
But even this still failed our build. Is it possible to re add what was previously working for now since it takes time for it to propagate back to V8:
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7467869
Actually I think I found what the issue was, you reject all the non-true flags with `if (_value == "true" || _value == "1") {` under `build/buildflag_header.gni` so I just changed the condition during `cfg` instead in the above CL, please take another look.
| Inspect html for hidden footers to help with email filtering. To unsubscribe visit settings. |