Attention needed from Danilo Tedeschi and Nicholas Verne
Tim added 2 comments![Open in Gerrit]()
Patchset-level comments
File-level comment, Patchset 12 (Latest):Tim .
resolvedHigh level question on this one: I like the move to LanguageTag::GetParentTag, but I feel we've now got two very similar loops in order to get the full chain of tags for both cases. Would it make more sense to keep l10n::GetParents and put the for loop in there instead? Then we don't even need to update the callers and can keep the testing. Alternatively maybe adding a LanguageTag::GetParentTags (plural) for this behavior?
File extensions/common/extension_resource_unittest.cc
Line 193, Patchset 12 (Latest): .value_or(base::i18n::GetKnownLanguageTag("und"));Tim .
unresolvedWhy are we only doing the fallback "und" behavior on this version and not the one in the other file?
Open in GerritRelated details
Attention is currently required from:
- Danilo Tedeschi
- Nicholas Verne
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: chromium/src
Gerrit-Branch: main
Gerrit-Change-Id: Id2737ea3a8c819b27648900faf1e44fcddac7085
Gerrit-Change-Number: 8120546
Gerrit-PatchSet: 12
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 22:17:30 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No