On Sep 22, 2022, at 5:01 PM, Thomas Anderson <thomasa...@chromium.org> wrote:
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "chromium-packagers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to chromium-packag...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/chromium-packagers/CAMEXDrk_fp7RS3CgYdsXAokmFouNCqjCrDTs8fBrj6jdnN49zQ%40mail.gmail.com.
Hi Thomas,Is the plan to completely replace GTK usage with QT?
If so, how does this impact Chromium embedders or distributors from a QT licensing perspective?
In case of dynamic linking, it is possible, but not mandatory, to keep application source code proprietary as long as it is “work that uses the library” – typically achieved via dynamic linking of the library.
Hi Thomas,
Is there a reason that there's no option to generate the moc file
used by the Qt build with the moc
tool at build time? This makes sure that the moc file that's
generated is compatible with the build-time version of Qt.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/chromium-packagers/CAMEXDrnW%3DwBJyxWwQ%3DHtjr7U0LELOsAYyxicrfef1UsH%2BwJJJQ%40mail.gmail.com.
-- Saikrishna Arcot