El día miércoles, abril 12, 2017 a las 01:08:24p. m. -0400, Mike Frysinger escribió:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > El día miércoles, abril 12, 2017 a las 12:56:32p. m. -0400, Mike Frysinger escribió:
> > > CrOS's expected partition layout is configured at build time. if you want
> > > to use a different setup, you'll need to build it yourself.
> >
> > Why is this? Sounds like it should be as much as possible impossible to
> > install it on any other given hardware which is not designed for and sold
> > with CrOS.
>
> first, you're confusing Chrome OS with Chromium OS. we're not talking
> about Chrome OS.
Yes, sorry. The confusion is a bit fueled by the pages at
https://www.chromium.org/chromium-os
which deal with both, Google Chrome OS and Chromium OS, even if they
state the difference in the FAQ. I came to all this from an Acer C720
Chromebook, which I changed to boot FreeBSD CURRENT, some two years ago.
> second, it doesn't change the fact that the partition layout is baked
> at build time. it's irrelevant to devices. the default amd64-generic
> build is configured to use specific partition numbers on the device
> for stateful and such. this is simply how Chromium OS build is
> designed.
My question remains: Why I can not install Chromium OS into one
partition of any disk, even as an alternate boot option to test things
out and look how they work? Is it possible to install the produced image
onto a second external USB disk (this is what I do when testing new or
special thinks within FreeBSD, I just install to an external USB disk
and boot from this my C720 and run the tests)?