I've been paying attention to this feed for several reasons and just thought this an appropriate moment to interject. It does not go against Linux by design. Ultimately it comes down to multiple shells and authorities. To be entirely honest I think that a simple command and predefined snippets is a fantastic idea to grant access. it will be quite a project but ultimately I think that it will be entirely worth it. If I were going to undertake such an endeavor I would first gain a better understanding of the way DBus works on ChromeOS devices because the processes that are used to mask and rename different ports and interfaces so that they can only easily be seen by the intended recipients is a similar computing concept.
I've been doing quite a lot of study of the shells used in ChromeOS and working with various distros to gain different types of hardware access recently. If you expand on the concept please keep me informed and perhaps I could be of assistance. I believe that ultimately we are working toward a breathing machine for all computing and making certain that we eliminate cross contaminations is important! I, personally, don't have the time for the undertaking but eventually it will have to be done so please let me know if you're going to jump at it or not.
PS: I was going through system logs the other day and learned something and found a concerning entry. I learned that the MouseCursorContainer isn't set to be drawn into the 'UI Hierarchy: Layers' when it is first run which is why, I assume, therr is no mouse access in the v2 shell (but there theoretically could be). There is nothing during the establishment if UI Views and when the system is then booting the 'UI hierarchy: Windows' it simply sends a signal of "ctrl+shift" to add the visual mouse to the keyboard.
rd in the ExoShellSurface. (not completely pertinent but just a new snippet I recently gained) The concerning entry...
within 2 seconds of the beginning of the chrome_system_log, after informing me that it is unable to verify the multidevice_setup client factory or the gpu_surface_factory, I'm informed that perfetto cannot be accessed and then notified that the mouse 'has been flagged as a suspected imposter mouse'.
PSS: I believe that these observations are a direct result of a few small xfce4 scripts that I had written to initially establish a second full distro (have something to do with the org,freedesktop.DBus) When I find the time I will interpret it all better. If I cannot figure it out I'll have to pose the issue to the community but in the meantime, if you have any idea
[input_ime_api_chromeos.cc(969)] The engine is not active. extension id: jkghodnilhceideoidjikpgommlajknk