nicholas wrote:
> I'd imagine that most users are happy with any monospaced font until
> they're given reason to change it (eg: a missing glyph, etc)
>
> I think that among the subset of users that are using the default font
> settings, more of them would be inconvenienced by their font not
> rendering correctly than would be inconvenienced (or even notice) that
> their font changed to Noto. That being said, I think the amount of
> chromium-hterm users that would ever encounter that particular
> rendering error within the context of a terminal window is probably
> smaller than the amount of people who would notice their font changing.
>
> All in all, I'd still say +1 to Noto as default.
agreed on all of the above. i'd go ahead and fix it. speaking for
myself, i didn't even know the font was selectable, and certainly not
how to select it. i have to imagine there are a lot of folks like me,
including in places where the current font bug would be noticed.
(i'm actually a little confused by the exchange between rginda and mike,
below, as to whether installations using the current default, unchanged,
will be affected.)
paul
>
> On Thursday, May 4, 2017 at 8:45:36 PM UTC-5, rginda wrote:
>
> It'll impact everyone who hasn't changed the default font, which is
> probably most installs. I'd lean towards not changing this.
> On May 4, 2017 6:08 PM, "Mike Frysinger" <
vap...@chromium.org <javascript:>>
> wrote:
> from what i can tell, it shouldn't impact existing installs. the defaults
> are initialized when you run it, and they stick across your browser syncs.
> so even if you sign into a new chromebook, your prefs would sync across,
> and nothing would change for you.
...
=----------------------
paul fox,
p...@foxharp.boston.ma.us (arlington, ma, where it's 44.1 degrees)