the time v3 extensions are mandatory, which is Jan 2023? > > > Extremely. > > [can an offscreen document] > > > 1. Have it's own CSP defined and request external

WebExtensions/manifest.json/content_security_policy , eg* Thanks Ilyaigpetrov for the information. What you have mentioned is correct regarding discussion over meet. I will

exists in Manifest V3, but it > can only be used by extensions that are force-installed using Chrome's > enterprise policies: ExtensionSettings, > ExtensionInstallForcelist

extension with v3? piątek, 22 lipca 2022 o 13:58:22 UTC+2 yankovic...@gmail.com napisał(a): > There's nothing complicated there. I advise you to use the HTTP API > amplitude

> - Manifest v3: Release / Review process > <#m_-1894268495633956118_group_thread_1> - 1 Update > - Refused to load the script 'https://www.googletagmanager

> - Manifest v3 webrequest blocking > <#m_1089133886839054490_group_thread_3> - 1 Update > - Sending message <#m_1089133886839054490_group_thread_4>

the final manifest.json. If your manifest.json is simply copied from source then it should have "index.html". If it's auto-generated somehow, then you need to fix

blocked on manifest v3 for unpacked extension. >>>> Can we give unpacked extensions the same webRequestBlocking capability >>>> as forced-install extension

Chrome extension manifest v3). >>>>>>>>> [image: Screenshot 2022-03-11 at 11.07.46.png] >>>>>>>>> [image: Screenshot

exist in Manifest V3. You have to use chrome.scripting.executeScript() which cannot execute a string of code. You have two choices if you want to change or fix your extension's

> it's manifest, you will see a message that says "'webRequestBlocking' >> requires manifest version of 2 or lower". This message is a warning,

but your manifest says it is on the root folder, so prepend public/ > to the default_popup value. > > Regarding the other errors, nothing in the code you shared points to >

forget that Manifest V3 completely forbids remote code. https://developer.chrome.com/docs/webstore/program_policies/#mv3-req It's irrelevant that you can still execute

to Chrome V3. > In the code I am trying to append a node using appendChild. > > Code snippet I have used to inject the java script to the DOM of page been > opened by Browser is

update my manifest to v3 > > here it is: > { > "name": "Invert.io", > "description": "Invert Dark to Light and vice versa"

> > It wouldn't have been able to see your browsing history unless you > explicitly approved the installation of a version that had “

fine with Manifest v2, but does not behave the same anymore in Manifest v3. >> In case you need to run any async function (eg against the Chrome API) >> this will not work anymore

extension to v3, I followed the migration guide >>> and was able to migrate the plugin successfully. But I noticed one issue. >>> >>> So my plugin injects

informed that manifest >> V2 is phasing out and I need to replace my background page with a service >> worker. From what I've read this means I need to handle each event

. in Manifest v2 it was possible because we could > access the window object from the background and we use navigator.webdrive > property but now in Manifest v3 we can't anymore

API with manifest v3. The PrintJob type needs a CJT ticket which throws an Invalid Ticket error in console. Here's how my ticket looks like (which I got from https://developers

targeting the Manifest V3 platform. If anyone knows of one, though, I'm also interested; I'd love to see how others are teaching Manifest V3 development. This isn't exactly

at the manifest is not enough to know what domains an >>>>>>>> extension can block content in. >>>>>>>> >>>>>

is my manifest v3 code. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *manifest.json* >>>>>>> { >>>>>>> "

) in manifest.json, add "platform": ["desktop"] or >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "platform": ["desktop

requirements around manifest v3, and comfortable and experienced with fairly complicated (and poorly-written—by me!) extensions. This is not a simple extension, and I know it will

> The Manifest V3 version of this page is > https://developer.chrome.com/docs/extensions/mv3/permission_warnings/#permissions_with_warnings > . > > Thanks

transitioning to Manifest V3 and one of the remaining features that > we cannot easily implement is related to MIME type handling. The current > MV2 extension uses blocking webRequest

the Plugin Manifest version to V3 >>> nothing else , I suspect it's either that or the Browser , Any pointers on >>> how i can investigate this ? >>>

> for Manifest V3, but unfortunately it looks like porting it to Python 3 may >> require more Python skill than I currently have. It looks like there are a >> number of