Rejection Feedback

[Rich]

Hi,

I've inherited a management of an extension, and have recieved multiple rejections. Each time the rejection is vague, while the reason is given, there is no reference to the file, or location in code where the offense is occuring.

Currently dealing with "Violation: Including remotely hosted code in a Manifest V3 item." You cleary know where you found this in the code, why not just share this in the rejection report?

For a precvious violation, I had to email support and wait days before a verbose reason was given, with the exact code location. Would have made sense to include that upfront, no?

Given the long time turnaround for each review, it's becomes very frustrating trying to fix these issues.

Thanks.