On 5月12日, 上午6時40分, zOQui <
mazo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've made an extension that request audio (mp3) extraction from a
> youtube video by making use ofwww.video2mp3.netservices.
> After three days in gallery (with hundred of users), Google banned it
> from Gallery hosting.
> There is already another extension that has tons of users, but it is
> still available for installation (youtube2mp3).
> The concept of working is a bit different: once youtube2mp3, redirect
> the user to the video2mp3 page, and mine extension perform all
> requests and file downloading by itself.
> No my questions:
> 1) Why youtube2mp3 is not banned?
> 2) What's will happen if change my extension to start the downloading
> from a third part web site, will it still be illegal?
> 3) Does not both bringing the same content to the user?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-extensions" group.