Hello Wrox,
Thank you for the feedback. It is sometimes interesting to hear a
different perspective on ideas, and I always welcome a good
discussion.
I hear your concerns about Web Security. This is very important, and
it is taken very seriously at the Google Chrome project.
The utmost care is taken to ensure safe web standards. In fact, if
you can find a security vulnerability, there might be a cash
reward involved from Google!
There is something to remember about this project. This project will
help synchronize the same data that you already
have on your Google account: no more, no less. If you don't post your
calendar appointments in Google Calendar, it won't
be in the cloud. If you don't put privacy information in your E-mail,
it will not be in the cloud.
There are many benefits to cloud computing. There has also been some
interesting research into ways to hack cloud computing.
As security improves, hacking skills improve. This is an ongoing
process, and security is a hot field right now. If you are interested
in computer security, make sure you take an Information Security
course during your studies, if you have not already. This is a hot
field, and it is only getting hotter.
You are talking about standards, and there is no issue with standards
that I know of. So, I would like to hear what you feel
is being broken by the standards. You say that you are an expert Web
Developer. This tells me that you probably were having
problems in the past rendering a page in Google Chrome. No software
is perfect; all software contains bugs. The important point is
that you fix the known bugs quickly. Following standards is important
to do. The editor of the HTML5 specification is Ian Hickson.
Ian Hickson who works at Google so I do think that Google takes
standards seriously; otherwise, I don't think that they would have
hired him
to work on the specification. If you had a problem with getting a
proper layout using some CSS or HTML, could you write up a bug and
explain what happened,
and why? This will help correct any problems that you have
encountered, and make Google Chrome a better browser for you.
When you question the term of rich interactive applications (RIA)s, I
think that you have maybe expected something more than what you may
have already seen. RIAs is being defined right now, and there is no
good definition of what it means. What does Web 2.0 mean? LOL. It's
a
marketing term, and as I have learned, I don't trust marketing! As
Google Chrome is being written, I think that this means different
things to
different people. In my case, I believe that an example of an RIAs
are capable of doing something that a good desktop application could
do.
I like the example of some work in progress is being done by
mugtug.com, an online photo editing application. They have a demo
that uses
HTML & Javascript which you can find here:
http://mugtug.com/darkroom/
To show you the power of the browser, I would like to show you
Chrome Experiments, which is a bunch of experiments showing off the
speed of the Javascript engine (V8) by going to
http://www.chromeexperiments.com/.
Let your imagination go wild, and you will see a lot of potential with
the browser.
Now we get onto the fact you said about "corporate control", which is
a touchy subject with everyone, and for good reasons. It is true that
Google does make its money on advertising. That is their revenue
model: most of the money made comes from advertising. But, look at
it
another way, if they did not use advertising, then to pay their bills,
they must then find another source of revenue.
There are many ways that they can come up with revenue, but I will
take the free searches with a little advertising on the side. Let the
businesses pay the businesses for advertising, and let me get my
searches, software, Google Docs, G-mail for free.