Basic realm message getting ignored after V49*

663 views
Skip to first unread message

Muzammil Rehman

unread,
Apr 11, 2016, 11:38:19 AM4/11/16
to Chromium-discuss
After V49.* I see the chrome is ignoring the "Basic realm" that I was pass via proxy while authenticating. I see the response header[1] has the right challenge message but what gets displayed is totally different [2]. Tried in firefox and it displayed message is right. 

Chrome version I am running is Version 49.0.2623.112 (64-bit)



1) 
WWW-Authenticate:
Basic realm="Login required username password and VIP token"

2)
3) Full response header 
HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized Server: nginx/1.7.9 Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 07:08:10 GMT Content-Type: text/html Content-Length: 596 WWW-Authenticate: Basic realm="Login required username password and VIP token"

PhistucK

unread,
Apr 11, 2016, 11:50:21 AM4/11/16
to muzamm...@gmail.com, Chromium-discuss
You can search crbug.com for an existing issue and star it. If you cannot find one, file a new issue using the "New issue" link on the same page.
Please, do not add a "+1" or "Me too" or "Confirmed" (or similar) comment. It just wastes the time of Chrome engineers and sends unnecessary e-mails to all of the people who starred the issue.

You can reply with a link to the found or created issue and might get triaged (and fixed) faster.

Thank you.



PhistucK

--
--
Chromium Discussion mailing list: chromium...@chromium.org
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/group/chromium-discuss

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to chromium-discu...@chromium.org.

Muzammil Rehman

unread,
Apr 11, 2016, 12:17:44 PM4/11/16
to Chromium-discuss, muzamm...@gmail.com
Thanks PhistucK, I did search and could not find any open issue matching my, so opened up a new one https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=602301
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages