CLS - API vs Bigquery

[Joaquin Tarrago]

Hello,

We've got a problem with CLS in our site and i want to do a deep analysis. We've got 3 different applications under our domain so firstly I need to understand if the problem is from one of those applications. So the filter origin is not enough for me.

With the api i can filter by a concrete url which is nice: --data '{"url": "https://www.emagister.com/cursos-inem-para-desempleados-gratuitos-online-tps-10270707.htm", great.  Then i want to know the evolution of this url by month but I think that I can't do this with the api. So i moved to BigQuery, now i can filter by month but i don't know how can I filter by URL in BigQuery, is it possible. I can't find it in the docs.

summarizing, is it possible in BigQuery to filter by url with the chrome-ux-report?

Thanks in advance :)

[Ryan Siddle]

Hi Joaquin,

 

BigQuery contains monthly data only by origin. If you wish to collect more information in real-time, you may wish to use web-vitals.js  

 

You would of course need to build your own storage and infrastructure for that data if you do not have a RUM provider that integrates the information for you already. You will also need to aggregate the data yourself to extract the 75^th percentile, along with other relevant metrics to slice the data. At least, we have been taking this approach by creating a high-throughput microservice for our client base who do not have the dev resources available for Q1/Q2 2021.

 

Best regards,

 

Ryan

 

Ryan Siddle / Digital Director
ryan....@merj.com

Merj
+44 (0) 2033 222 660 / Ext: #101
9th Floor, 1 Ropemaker Street, London, EC2Y 9HT
merj.com

Este correo electrónico, contiene información de carácter confidencial y se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario o destinatarios. Queda prohibido su uso, reproducción, alteración, archivo o comunicación a terceros sin la previa autorización escrita de Emagister Servicios de Formación, S.L. En el caso de haber recibido este correo electrónico por error, le rogamos borre de su sistema el mismo y notifíquelo al emisor respondiendo al correo. El emisor no se responsabiliza de posibles perjuicios derivados de la captura, incorporaciones de virus u otras manipulaciones efectuadas por terceros. En virtud de lo establecido en el Reglamento (UE) 2016/679 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 27 de abril de 2016 de Protección de Datos (RGPD), le informamos que los datos personales que nos facilite se tratarán de acuerdo con las condiciones de licitud y seguridad establecidas en el RGPD y en el marco de la actividad propia de la empresa y su organización, concretamente en la gestión del área de recursos humanos domiciliada en Avda. Alcalde Barnils, 64-68, Escalera D, 3ª Planta, 08174 Sant Cugat del Vallès, Barcelona, España, correo electrónico a p...@emagister.com.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chrome UX Report (Discussions)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to chrome-ux-repo...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/chrome-ux-report/c274434a-73e5-4300-8ff9-9f346c9d6a03n%40chromium.org.

[Rick Viscomi]

Hi Joaquin,

Your use case sounds perfect for Search Console's Core Web Vitals report. It will group similar pages together and report their aggregate CWV performance. If you discover that there are pages with poor performance, you can drill down to get a list of sample URLs in that page group. It monitors CWV compliance over time too.

If you have any questions about using the report, you can direct them to the webmaster forums.

Rick