Summary API - "The model was available but there was not an execution config available for the feature."

[Raymond Camden]

If I run ai.summarizer.capabilities(), I get:

"The model was available but there was not an execution config available for the feature."

Anything in particular I can try to get past this?

[Ryan Seddon]

Ok so now it works in Chrome Dev but not canary? Do I just need to wait for this mysterious execution config to run at some point for canary releases?

On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 10:02 AM Ryan Seddon <rse...@zendesk.com> wrote:

It's got that message in the doc, as was pointed out to me when I asked the same question. You need to wait a day as that execution config runs once a day.

I have no idea what it is or why it runs once a day but mine works now and didn't yesterday.

--

Ryan Seddon

Principal Engineer, Portfolio Architect - APAC

Zendesk

Twitter: @ryanseddon

[Ryan Seddon]

It's got that message in the doc, as was pointed out to me when I asked the same question. You need to wait a day as that execution config runs once a day.

I have no idea what it is or why it runs once a day but mine works now and didn't yesterday.

On Wednesday, September 4, 2024 at 4:21:17 AM UTC+10 Raymond Camden wrote:

[Thomas Steiner]

On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 5:45 AM 'Ryan Seddon' via Chrome Built-in AI Early Preview Program Discussions <chrome-ai-dev-...@chromium.org> wrote:

Do I just need to wait for this mysterious execution config to run at some point for canary releases?

Yes, this is a bit inconvenient at the moment, but unfortunately there's no better way right now. It's a temporary annoyance.

 

On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 10:02 AM Ryan Seddon <rse...@zendesk.com> wrote:

It's got that message in the doc, as was pointed out to me when I asked the same question. You need to wait a day as that execution config runs once a day.

I have no idea what it is or why it runs once a day but mine works now and didn't yesterday.

On Wednesday, September 4, 2024 at 4:21:17 AM UTC+10 Raymond Camden wrote:

If I run ai.summarizer.capabilities(), I get:

"The model was available but there was not an execution config available for the feature."

Anything in particular I can try to get past this?

--

Ryan Seddon

Principal Engineer, Portfolio Architect - APAC

Zendesk

Twitter: @ryanseddon

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chrome Built-in AI Early Preview Program Discussions" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to chrome-ai-dev-previe...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/chrome-ai-dev-preview-discuss/CAJK%3DBLbUk1FKRc_S%3DiBe%3DVWAQzhN7L4c43m_m8zO%3DbZVSAVySw%40mail.gmail.com.

--

Thomas Steiner, PhD—Developer Relations Engineer (blog.tomayac.com, toot.cafe/@tomayac)

Google Germany GmbH, ABC-Str. 19, 20354 Hamburg, Germany
Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Liana Sebastian
Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891

----- BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE -----

Version: GnuPG v2.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iFy0uwAntT0bE3xtRa5AfeCheCkthAtTh3reSabiGbl0ck

0fjumBl3DCharaCTersAttH3b0ttom.xKcd.cOm/1181.

----- END PGP SIGNATURE -----

[Raymond Camden]

So in theory, I try today and it may work?

[Thomas Steiner]

On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 3:07 PM Raymond Camden <raymon...@gmail.com> wrote:

So in theory, I try today and it may work?

Yepp. Tell us how it goes in practice :-)

 

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/chrome-ai-dev-preview-discuss/CAK2avF9QP5oJpWYfDvjJn9QJN37K_PVPdxdq4QzrDv8C2WOoQw%40mail.gmail.com.

[Raymond Camden]

Quick test - no go. Restarted Chrome Dev, still no go. But technically it hasn't been 24 hours. Will try again in the afternoon.

--

===========================================================================
Raymond Camden

Email : raymon...@gmail.com
Blog : www.raymondcamden.com
Twitter: raymondcamden

[Raymond Camden]

And now it's working. I know it's been brought up - but yall are well aware of all this trouble and it will be fixed eventually, right? :)

[Thomas Steiner]

Thanks for reporting back your success :-) Yes, we do hope to make this better in the future.