ikilpatrick@ - adding you for review on this one since you had suggested opting masonry out of this special replaced item logic originally. If you think it still makes sense for masonry to opt out of this, I can instead update the test expectations for this one
Inspect html for hidden footers to help with email filtering. To unsubscribe visit settings. |
Code-Review | +1 |
// Don't apply special 'fit-content' behavior for replaced items in
// a masonry container.
Might want to add a TODO here or link to a CSSWG bug for this behavior since it sounds like it's not decided
Inspect html for hidden footers to help with email filtering. To unsubscribe visit settings. |
// Don't apply special 'fit-content' behavior for replaced items in
// a masonry container.
Might want to add a TODO here or link to a CSSWG bug for this behavior since it sounds like it's not decided
Yeah, we may still want this - I wasn't fully sure why we would or wouldn't want this for masonry. Will hold off on a TODO until Ian weighs in, and depending on the path forward, I can plan to add a TODO for this, too
Inspect html for hidden footers to help with email filtering. To unsubscribe visit settings. |
Code-Review | +1 |
// Don't apply special 'fit-content' behavior for replaced items in
// a masonry container.
Alison MaherMight want to add a TODO here or link to a CSSWG bug for this behavior since it sounds like it's not decided
Yeah, we may still want this - I wasn't fully sure why we would or wouldn't want this for masonry. Will hold off on a TODO until Ian weighs in, and depending on the path forward, I can plan to add a TODO for this, too
Yeah that works too, just want to make sure this is tracked somewhere
Inspect html for hidden footers to help with email filtering. To unsubscribe visit settings. |