blink-dev

On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 11:21 AM Alex Russell <sligh...@chromium.org> wrote: > Why would

On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 12:03 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) <yoav...@chromium.org> wrote: Thanks

Contact Emails ari...@chromium.org, samschl...@chromium.org, phil...@chromium.org, sauski@

LGTM3 On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 12:34 PM Mike Taylor <mike...@chromium.org> wrote: Thanks for

Contact emails vizl...@microsoft.com, toyo...@chromium.org, ba...@chromium.org Explainer None

Will it allow detection of incognito mode, though? Hopefully not... ☆PhistucK On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at

Alex, I trimmed down the quote reply below to point out that Emilio is asking for more web developer

LGTM2 - I see that Mozilla has proposed a positive position via comment. On 3/17/25 2:25 PM, 'Dan

LGTM1 On 3/17/25 8:55 PM, Chromestatus wrote: Contact emails chri...@chromium.org Explainer None

Contact emails rmce...@chromium.org, ze...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/

Given that the design of this feature doesn't require a specific backend implementation, going to

None yet, I've got to rework some of the internals but got a little busy. I'll hopefully have

Hey Chris, Do you have a sense for what fraction of Storage Access API use (yes, I know it's low)

Hey Anders, I deeply appreciate the work you did to investigate the incompatibilities you found. Dan

Hey Mason, This looks good, but I'm not sure I understand the plan. Is it to deprecate (w/

Thanks everyone! We've flipped the feature flag for this to be enabled by default, and the

Hi! I see that it only fails those tests in serialization, not actually computing the value. So it

On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 4:22 PM 'Panos Astithas' via blink-dev <blin...@chromium.org>

Thanks for patiently re-highlighting what was (mostly) already in the intent. :) LGTM to extend from

Thank you! On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 1:50 AM Alex Russell <sligh...@chromium.org> wrote: LGTM1

On 3/10/25 10:12 AM, Stephen McGruer wrote: > It may change shape before finally shipping (in

LGTM3 On 3/12/25 12:47 PM, Alex Russell wrote: LGTM2 On Wednesday, March 12, 2025 at 12:02:05 PM UTC-

Thanks to everyone for taking the time to get this to a place where we can accept it. As there are

These proposed metrics sound reasonable to us, so long as they capture all cases where the behavior

Sorry, redundant email. You have 3 LGTMs. On Wed, Mar 12, 2025, 7:52 AM Chris Harrelson <chrishtr@

LGTM3 On Tuesday, March 11, 2025 at 5:33:15 PM UTC+1 Noam Rosenthal wrote: On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 11

On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 9:18 AM Jiacheng Guo <g...@google.com> wrote: Yes, inserting render-

Thank you for the pointers on crrev.com/c/6325710 -- adding any restrictions in WebView would be a

Thanks. LGTM to experiment from M135 to M139 inclusive (I think that's what you've requested,

LGTM3 Please make sure that the fallback is documented somewhere where developers can find it (eg MDN