blink-dev

> What is the API for formatting a Temporal object in a specific locale, equivalent to new Intl.

LGTM3 for 5% /Daniel On 2025-10-01 17:24, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM2 to go to 5% On Wed, Oct

LGTM3 I think the API is fine as-is. Rick made a good point as well that the spec as defined allows

Awesome to see this about to ship! On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 2:55 PM Mike Taylor <miketaylr@chromium

LGTM3 On 9/30/25 12:57 am, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: Great, I have updated the rollout plan in the

Contact emails mste...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification https://drafts.csswg.org/css-anchor

A quick note for API owners: the feature name has been changed to "Sticky user activation across

A quick update: We have decided to delay our launch by one milestone due to a bug that could break

I have again updated the spreadsheet of stable feature flags with a new tab. I've updated the old

LGTM3 On 9/29/25 11:20 am, 'Dan Clark' via blink-dev wrote: LGTM2 On Monday, September 29,

LGTM3 On Wednesday, September 24, 2025 at 8:14:08 AM UTC-7 dan...@microsoft.com wrote: LGTM2 On

Hey Stepen, Any progress? Again, inclined to LGTM, as the arguments we've heard from other

Contact emails ksc...@microsoft.com Explainer https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/MSEdgeExplainers/blob/

Hi, Done, thanks ! On 9/29/25 06:33, 一丝 wrote: I've noticed that CL also implements the two-value

Contact emails or...@igalia.com Specification https://w3c.github.io/gamepad/#extensions-to-the-

Hi Rick, Daniel, I'm looking at the case of a non-persistent and document-local dictionary that

Could you please request reviews for security, privacy, enterprise etc in your chromestatus entry? On

Thank you for the reviews, everyone. The flag to undo the added comma for en-AU, en-GB, and en-IN is

Contact emails vmp...@google.com Specification https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12116

Contact emails nrose...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification https://github.com/whatwg/html/

On behalf of Christian and the team, thank you all for the review and approval! (...and sorry Mike

Hey Victor, I appreciate you taking the time to outline this here. I have some background on Web

LGTM3 On Wednesday, September 24, 2025 at 5:06:58 PM UTC+2 Alex Russell wrote: LGTM2; thanks for

LGTM to experiment M141-M144 (The title confused me as I thought this is an intent to extend an

LGTM3 /Daniel On 2025-09-22 21:25, Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM2 On 9/22/25 2:41 pm, Alex Russell wrote:

Would having this let authors somewhat more easily work around the intentionally-unsupported

Hey, here's the best practice for testing support for scrollIntoView({container: 'nearest

Contact emails dgr...@chromium.org, p...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/

LGTM3 On Wednesday, September 17, 2025 at 8:38:36 AM UTC-7 Daniel Bratell wrote: LGTM2 conditional on

from a Web author perspective, it's quite common that we attempt to lock scrolling on the