blink-dev

Contact emails dr...@chromium.org Explainer No information provided Specification https://www.w3.org/

FWIW, my LGTM for the original launch was contingent on a kill switch (see down thread). So hopefully

I wanted to provide an update on the proposed change. A single site/bug was brought to my attention,

blink-dev isn't really the right place to raise this issue, but I will try to pass this along to

Contact emails e...@igalia.com, fw...@igalia.com Specification https://w3c.github.io/mathml-core/#

Just to verify, this will not remove document.evaluate which depends on XPath - right? It is the only

Contact emails jlav...@google.com, andres...@chromium.org, fma...@chromium.org, schenney@

Reaching out to site owners was mostly for a sanity check that the resource is not expecting to be

Contact emails m...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/manifest-incubations/blob/gh-pages/

Thank you Deepti - ample evidence of progress here as well. LGTM to extend 3 more milestones (M143 to

Thank you Deepti - ample evidence of progress here. LGTM to extend 3 more milestones (M143 to M145

Hi! Within the scope of this launch the API was exposed just to `Window`, despite the spec mentioning

On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 5:51 PM Joey Arhar <jar...@chromium.org> wrote: > is this approach

LGTM3 On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 1:19 PM Daniel Bratell <brat...@gmail.com> wrote: LGTM2 /Daniel

I'm not sure how that would work for primitive types without an optional type or requiring a

Contact emails jka...@chromium.org, k...@google.com, lin...@chromium.org Documentation https://

Contact emailsl...@microsoft.com, liahi...@microsoft.com Explainer https://aka.ms/webinstall

Thanks Rohan. It looks to me like the discussion has converged on the core aspects of the design. So

LGTM3 On Wednesday, October 29, 2025 at 11:10:37 AM UTC-4 Alex Russell wrote: LGTM2 On Wednesday,

LGTM3 On Tuesday, October 28, 2025 at 2:26:12 PM UTC+1 Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM2 On 10/22/25 7:35 pm,

LGTM3 On Saturday, October 25, 2025 at 4:56:13 PM UTC+2 Mike Taylor wrote: I see, thanks. Marking

LGTM1 /Daniel On 2025-10-29 15:44, Chromestatus wrote: Contact emails jfern...@igalia.com

LGTM3 to ship and deprecate (but not yet remove). On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 8:36 AM Mike Taylor <

Just to be clear: anchored elements *will* respond to transform changes on the anchor, and be re-laid

Contact emails sche...@chromium.org, zs...@igalia.com Explainer https://drafts.csswg.org/css-ui/#

LGTM3 On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 9:23 PM Daniel Bratell <brat...@gmail.com> wrote: LGTM2 /Daniel

Contact emails jja0...@gmail.com Specification https://www.w3.org/TR/css-text-4/#propdef-letter-

On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 9:23 AM Ane Diaz De Tuesta <ane...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi everyone, I

Given that we're adding support to a new type of value, an Intent to Ship is a better fit than a

Great, thanks Mohamed! Nice to see all the green. On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 1:21 PM Mohamed Amir Yosef