blink-dev

Contact emails ssi...@chromium.org Specification https://www.w3.org/TR/mst-content-hint/#dom-

Let me know what questions you have. Indeed, almost everything is N/A (I've filled them out in

Contact emails jja0...@gmail.com Specification https://www.w3.org/TR/css-text-4/#propdef-letter-

Contact emails ror...@microsoft.com, rago...@microsoft.com, dan...@chromium.org Explainer https://

This is very exciting! Is this meant to work as well with dynamically fetched options, similar to the

Hi Blink Dev/Owners I'd like to signal intent to ship the new field rtpTimestamp on VideoFrame.

Contact emails nrose...@chromium.org Specification https://drafts.csswg.org/css-backgrounds-3/#

Contact emails va...@chromium.org, cl...@chromium.org Explainer No information provided Specification

Contact emails vmp...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/vmpstr/htmldemos/blob/master/vt/

Hi Bramus! Thank you for reaching out! I tried to reproduce the issue, but I haven't been able to

IWA OWNER LGTM This is an extension to an existing IWA-only feature. Multicast introduces additional

Responding for Suresh since he's OOO this week. We have UKM metrics that tell us which IDPs would

Responding for Suresh since he's OOO this week. For breakage, we already have UKM metrics for any

I see - thank you very much for the explanation and test cases! Sounds good to me. :) ☆PhistucK On

Could you please request the Privacy, Security, Enterprise, etc bits in your chromestatus entry? On

Contact emails or...@igalia.com Specification https://w3c.github.io/gamepad/#extensions-to-the-

Sorry, I missed a step in making the candidate resource list public. I have moved it to my chromium

Contact emails ft...@google.com Specification https://tc39.es/ecma402/#sec-Intl.Locale.prototype.

Context: This feature has been implemented behind an experimental status flag for over a year and has

Contact emails lin...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/nav-speculation/blob/main/

The Firefox implementation of chromestatus requires an update, which has already shipped in Firefox

On Thu, Oct 16, 2025, 2:58 AM 'Harald Alvestrand' via blink-dev <blin...@chromium.org

Hi Rick, We are in touch with the impacted major consumers(Google docs and codemirror) and they are

LGTM3 /Daniel On 2025-10-15 17:15, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2 On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 7:01 AM '

LGTM3 On Wednesday, October 15, 2025 at 7:33:27 AM UTC-7 Rick Byers wrote: Looks great to me, LGTM2.

LGTM3 On Wednesday, October 15, 2025 at 11:09:02 AM UTC-4 Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM2 On 10/14/25 1:53

Thanks for the explainer. This seems like a small and clearly beneficial extension to WebTransport to

Seems like a minor incremental risk on top of the broader LNA feature. Thank you for being careful

The compat risk of this seems minor and manageable to me. The exact use of socket pools is really an

Thanks, makes sense. So IMHO it's debatable whether you need API owners approval for this.