blink-dev

As we announced in the recent Protected Audience Intent to Deprecate and Remove, Protected Audience

LGTM3 - Risk seems manageable even though it's unfortunately hard to measure. That it has worked

> Such external load requests are passed up from the parser and allowed only if they are a same

LGTM3 - per previous proclamations /Daniel On 2025-11-12 17:23, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2 with the

LGTM2 for deprecation (not for the actual removal) /Daniel On 2025-11-12 17:28, Vladimir Levin wrote:

Part of the reason that I think that we can remove the other "privacy sandbox" features so

LGTM3 /Daniel On 2025-11-12 17:30, Vladimir Levin wrote: LGTM2 On Wednesday, November 12, 2025 at 11:

LGTM3 according to Vlad's plan. /Daniel On 2025-11-12 17:19, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2 with

LGTM3 On Wednesday, November 12, 2025 at 11:06:13 AM UTC-5 Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2 On Wed, Nov

LGTM3 On Wednesday, November 12, 2025 at 11:05:15 AM UTC-5 Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2 On Wed, Nov

LGTM3 since the fallback seems to be acceptable /Daniel On 2025-11-10 01:45, Mike Taylor wrote:

I am sorry for the missing mail. LGTM1 from me so now you have the three necessary LGTMs. I hope the

Contact emails fhern...@google.com, ol...@google.com, hong...@google.com, agp...@google.com,

Yes, shipping sounds reasonable. If discussion aligns on allowing caret-shape for IME, turning it

On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 10:08 AM xeere <xeer...@gmail.com> wrote: If the solution is this

Contact emails fla...@chromium.org, zhoupe...@bytedance.com Specification https://www.w3.org/TR/

https://drafts.csswg.org/css-anchor-position-1/#anchor-position-size has this: > Transforms are

No unfortunately we did not do it at the time. Now it's clear we really need to do it. On Wed,

Contact emails go...@google.com, n...@google.com, cbies...@google.com Explainer https://github.com/

Thanks. LGTM3 to ship, but please prioritize clarifying the spec. On 11/10/25 4:40 pm, Divyansh

Thanks both, I think you're spot on with these concerns, both could cause potential breakage and

On Sat, Nov 8, 2025 at 1:32 PM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) <yoav...@chromium.org> wrote: I'm

LGTM3 On Fri, Nov 7, 2025 at 1:57 AM Philip Jägenstedt <foo...@chromium.org> wrote: LGTM2 The

WebRTC leaks the user's local network IP under the Tor network. Steps to reproduce the problem

LGTM3 On 11/6/25 1:20 pm, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: LGTM2 On Thu, Nov 6, 2025 at 7:14 PM 'Frank

Thanks everyone for the review. As per Rick's comment, I will keep this thread updated. On

LGTM3 On Wed, Nov 5, 2025 at 5:33 PM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) <yoav...@chromium.org> wrote:

LGTM3 On Wednesday, November 5, 2025 at 8:08:01 AM UTC-8 Vladimir Levin wrote: That makes sense

On Wed, Nov 5, 2025 at 9:08 AM Ashley Gullen <ash...@scirra.com> wrote: Given that the existing

LGTM3 On Wed, Nov 5, 2025 at 8:41 AM Sebastian Zartner <sebastia...@gmail.com> wrote: For