blink-dev

Note that we are discussing dropping media-progress() and container-progress() from the spec. https:/

Contact emails mste...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification https://drafts.csswg.org/css-anchor

Contact emails g...@google.com Explainer https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/11070 Specification

I believe this was the intent for non-WebView PaymentRequest: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.

Re TAG: I don't believe we need a TAG review for deprecations or removals. On Tuesday, March 4,

On Tuesday, March 4, 2025 at 11:17:42 AM UTC-5 Chromestatus wrote: Contact emails schenney@chromium.

On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 2:35 AM Andrew Williams <awi...@chromium.org> wrote: Hi everyone, Quick

[Repeating the same response as in the other carousel feature] Hi Xiaocheng, Thank you for digging in

Hi Xiaocheng, Thank you for digging in and scheduling time with Rob to discuss further. However our

Contact emails fut...@chromium.org, se...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts

Given your example, it seems like `video/mp4;codecs="hev1.1.6.L120.90"` is supported by

AV1 is great from a quality perspective, but it is not an option for use cases that require hardware

The disable was from M128 to M130. On Friday, February 28, 2025 at 8:05:49 PM UTC Mike Taylor wrote:

@Domenic, thanks for your feedback, I just updated the milestones. Regards the CSSWG current status

+1 that providing temporary enterprise policy exceptions is standard practice for breaking changes

LGTM3 On 3/2/25 9:51 PM, TAMURA, Kent wrote: LGTM2. On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 11:34 AM Domenic Denicola

@Muyao Thanks for your updates on this! Today I've found a new version of the Keyboard Lock

Done, requested reviews. On Sunday, March 2, 2025 at 9:35:30 PM UTC-5 Domenic Denicola wrote: Can you

On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 10:18 PM 'Dan Clark' via blink-dev <blin...@chromium.org>

On Monday, March 3, 2025 at 5:35:10 PM UTC+9 Domenic Denicola wrote: LGTM3, thanks for all the work

LGTM3 On Friday, February 28, 2025 at 1:55:26 AM UTC+9 Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM2 On 2/27/25 11:51 AM,

LGTM2. I'm saddened by the way the implementer community has not been able to converge upon and

Hey Reema, Very sorry that you've been on hold here. Thank you for doing some manual

I appreciate your perspective on this, Emilio. I don't understand the norms around comments in

> What are the spec implementations of this change? I don't believe that the spec requires a

By missing the end, I mean this: const ob = new Observable((subscriber) => { subscriber.next(1);

Thanks for the detailed response! It's quite a handful, but given the explanation you gave, would

This has been submitted as https://chromiumdash.appspot.com/commit/

An update, Mozilla has confirmed at https://github.com/web-platform-tests/interop/issues/855 that the

On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 1:41 AM 'Dan Clark' via blink-dev <blin...@chromium.org>