LGTM to experiment M127-M132 inclusive. On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 8:17 AM Domenic Denicola <dom...@chromium.org> wrote: Can you work on filing for TAG review, and asking other

that this experiment is going to collect data for presenting potential changes to the behaviour. That is correct, the goal of the experiment is to collect data so that we can decide whether

running an experiment and may have feedback for > us, so we'd like to not interrupt their study. (My earlier email was > definitely incorrect, I was thinking too hard about

LGTM to experiment in M128-131 inclusive. /Daniel On 2024-09-09 18:58, Victor Tan wrote: > > Hey Alex (and others), > > > Here's a few questions we asked ourselves

the updated experiment and the results are largely the same as in the first round. Caching resources corresponding to third-party opaque origin contexts results in speed-ups for

beacon-experiment@google.com > > Explainer > https://github.com/WICG/pending-beacon/blob/main/docs/fetch-later-api.md > > Specification https://whatpr

for this experiment (vs 6, which is the default allowed)? > > The sites who are interested in this are large and operate in the > financial sector, so I expect they will proceed

extend the experiment. On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 2:15 AM Guido Urdaneta wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 3:32 AM Domenic Denicola > wrote: > >> Thanks for the responses. >

LGTM to experiment 129-134 inclusive, or shifted if you can't start in 129. That said, I would expect things to change during the experiment, including the name. Like TAG I find

block the experiment. I would suggest starting a TAG review and gathering signals from other browser vendors soon. On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 1:15 AM Florin Malita wrote: > The main motivation

to “Intent to Experiment” blink-dev discussion* > > https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/3escBQGtIpM/m/ntcytva5BgAJ > https://groups.google

> This intent is also missing the normal info we have in I2Es, but I found > https://chromestatus.com/feature/5133113939722240. > > LGTM to experiment from M127 to M130

LGTM to experiment M129-M134 inclusive. On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 9:39 PM Daseul Lee wrote: > Contact emails > > asully@chromium.org, ayui@chromium.org, christinesm@chromium

to “Intent to Prototype” blink-dev discussion >> >> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/hvMJ33kqHRo >> >> Goals for experimentation

LGTM to experiment for M126-M129. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 9:08 AM Christian Biesinger < >>>> cbiesinger@chromium.org> wrote

of renewed experiment). >>>>> This ensures that partners have time to mint a new token and roll it out to >>>>> their production enviornment ahead

Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, >> such that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based >> applications? >> >>

that initial intent, and >>>> should have resulted in the original OT never landing. That would have >>>> avoided the mess we're in now. >>>

trial or experiment for >>> a feature may only run for 6 milestones" >>> >>> without knowing my initial ask was for just 3 milestones. I >>

from your intent, but I should have asked for clarifications on that front. Apologies! > > Also, there was significant progress on the spec since the last extension. > The

LGTM to experiment from M124 to M127 inclusive. >>>>> On 2/26/24 5:45 PM, Yi Gu wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Contact emails >>>

percentage finch experiment in M128-M130 (inclusive) > > /Daniel > On 2024-07-03 22:02, Chris Harrelson wrote: > > LGTM1 > > (probably 3 needed because this

standard > experiment. Does this extension also require 3? > > Thanks again! > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 1:00 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > >> LGTM to extend one more

to previous Intent discussions >>> >>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/W8j6RKDeRoM/m/FyCKOAG9AAAJ >>> >>

LGTM to experiment for 3 more milestones. Also: I asked Francis offline about the "soft launch in 126", and he clarified that it means we currently support both the new and

LGTM to experiment for 6 milestones from M128 to M133 inclusive. >> On 6/22/24 1:44 PM, Rick Byers wrote: >> >> Hello blink-dev, >> I'd like to request

want the experiment to run? > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 9:02 PM 'Alan Baker' via blink-dev < > blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > >> Contact emailsalanbaker

continue the experiment after Chrome 127, you'll need to register for a new token (CompressionDictionaryTransport*V3*). There were changes since the first trial. So please

126 (Intent to Ship thread > ) > and the flag has been enabled in the 126 branch. > > However, we have noticed an issue with the origin trial system which will > create a significant

LGTM to experiment from 127 to 133 inclusive >> >> On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 12:54 PM Di Zhang wrote: >> >>> Thanks Mike. Your explanation makes sense and we