expect this experiment doesn't make things worse, because this experiment doesn't change the cache hit logic, and only changes the lifetime of resources. There will be observable

LGTM to experiment w/ an OT for 6 milestones. >> >> On 2/9/23 1:57 PM, Adam Klein wrote: >> >> On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 1:32 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: >> >>

like to experiment *between M113 and M118 (inclusive)*. Does this still > look good to you? > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 5:07 PM Corentin Wallez > wrote: > >> Thank

LGTM to experiment M112-M117 (inclusive) On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 5:21 PM Nick Burris wrote: > > > On Thursday, February 23, 2023 at 9:29:57 AM UTC-4 Yoav Weiss wrote: > >

LGTM to experiment from 112 to 114 inclusive. On 2/21/23 8:47 PM, Yi Gu wrote: > Hi Mike > > Our plan is to run the origin trial from M112 to M114 (inclusive). > > Yi > >

for > experiment requests that are just starting out. That matches my understanding as well. > > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 6:41 AM Yoav Weiss > wrote: > > > >

% finch experiment on Stable and I'm >>>>> wondering what would be the required steps to do this (besides >>>>> flipping boxes on the launch crbug

Awesome, thank you so much! Arnaud

since this intent was approved, can you > send an "Intent to extend experimentation" so it'd get caught in our > tooling? > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 9:38 AM

Ads APIs experiment for all > APIs contained in the unified origin trial including: Topics, FLEDGE, > Fenced Frames, Attribution Reporting, Shared Storage, and Private >

reviewing this intent as part of the S&P review process and had > a few questions: > > - Does the document rules only apply to same-origin links in the page? > > It can

LGTM to experiment from M109 to M112. > > On 11/30/22 9:01 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: > > Contact emails yoavweiss@chromium.org > > Explainer > > https://github

a new Intent thread for that.* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As we look at M111 coming up, we realized we made a communication >>>

LGTM to experiment M110 till M115. On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 11:20 PM Liviu Tinta wrote: > Contact emails > > domenic@chromium.org, jbroman@chromium.org, liviutinta@chromium

> this experiment. >>> >>> We would like to run an origin trial for sites to opt into the Reduce >>> Accept-Language origin trial to proactively test

Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such >>>>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications? >>

On 11/21/22 08:49, Yoshifumi Inoue wrote: > /Gecko/: In development > (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1223880 > ) No active >

on the experiment. > > The Privacy team has spotted a potential information leak in this API > design, and we're working to land the fix in M109. > (See the the > >

of this experiment at least through M111 in January, 2023. On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 8:32 AM Mike West wrote: > LGTM to experiment from M105 to M109 (inclusive). It'd be excellent

Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that > it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications? > > > > Goals for experimentation

> > Experiment Timeline M107-M111 inclusive Reason this experiment is being > extended Like the previous extension, we believe the risks for burn-in > don't apply

Conditional Focus experiment again. It is > currently running m102-m108, and we'd like to extend by 3 additional > milestones, making it m102-m111 (inclusive). > >

have an experiment ready to > ship, instead of continuously announcing milestones and pushing them back. > > Thanks, > Arthur > > > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at

removal > intent passes. > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 3:19 PM Titouan Rigoudy wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 12:00 PM Yoav Weiss >> wrote: >> >>>

LGTM to experiment from M107 to M110 inclusive (which I believe is what you're requesting, feel free to correct me). On 10/5/22 3:00 PM, Alex Turner wrote: > > > Contact

% stable experiment > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 12:20 AM Mike Taylor > wrote: > >> *Contact emails* >> >> >> >> >> >> >>

extend the experiment M108-M110 inclusive Thanks for the detailed reports of addressed feedback. I'd also like to note that at least a few of the experimented APIs made good progress

conduct an experiment on that, and not deviate from >>> the 0.5% restriction of global page loads, we need an idea of how many >>> users will be able to be getting this

send this intent as an intent to deprecate and remove (and > change the chrome status name accordingly)? > > Resent in > https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/

Conditional Focus experiment again. It is > currently running m102-m108, and we'd like to extend by 3 additional > milestones, making it m102-m111 (inclusive). > >