makes sense to file a Firefox bug >> so they could also make this fix. >> >> -- Dan >> >> On Tuesday, March 17, 2026 at 12:55:03 PM UTC-7 Pranav Modi wrote

I decided to write the explainer and linked it in the feature. Here is a link to it as well: https://github.com/w3c/secure-payment-confirmation/blob/main/explainer-capabilities

are likely to become outdated at some point — without heavy caveats for anyone depending on them! To take learnings from a similar historic adage on this subject, 640k was never going

credentials be to the >>>> web site? >>>> >>>> What if I clear site data in the browser? >>>> >>> >>> Since

> wishes to transfer cookies or other state they'd have to do so themselves > (since migration is limited to same-site cases I believe you could use an > iframe or similar

been added to an agenda. Let's wait to see what the CSSWG decides. On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 5:07 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > On 3/17/26 5:48 am, Minseong Kim wrote: > > Thank you

the spec to call into > the Fetch monkey patch, and other general spec and WPT work in the past few > weeks. > > Good luck with the roll out! > On 3/11/26 5:56 pm, Chris Thompson

of things to meet the quality bar we > require for shipping. > On 3/6/26 11:49 am, Hubert Chao wrote: > > More WPTs are in, for the 3 types of workers (dedicated, service, and

LGTM to continue with your new plan. On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 1:59 PM Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > Hi again, > > This has not shipped yet, because I've been trying (very intermittently

this lead to a regression (of weird "used to work" mime type configs) see: https://issues.chromium.org/issues/492024623 here is a fix: https://chromium-review.googlesource

the implementation to match CSSWG >> resolutions. >> >> *Contact emails* >> kbabbitt@microsoft.com >> >> *Explainer* >> >>

I missed to update those entries earlier. I have updated the entries yesterday. ________________________________ From: Philip Jägenstedt Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2026 9:13

> option to select when the position has been filed but there hasn't yet been > a response. > The actual ChromePlatformStatus entry reflects the correct status for that

you want to set all background properties related to images in a single declaration, but without affecting the background-color. Then you can use: background: url("image"

CSS WG to resolve on the name of > the containment API, which is currently "view-transition-scope: > auto": https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/13123

" attribute to have certain predetermined > values on "dragEnter", "dragOver" and "dragLeave". Drag enter > and drag over should have

landing (to Yoav's point). > > Best, > > Alex > > On Monday, March 9, 2026 at 7:45:27 AM UTC-7 Hubert Chao wrote: > >> Following up, we've convinced

Android 147 ship tag. With this >> change, we now fire three additional events to the drag source on drag >> start: `pointercancel`, `pointerout` and `pointerleave`

is used to meet contrast requirements for accessibility. >> The contrast-color() function can be used anywhere in CSS where a color >> value is expected. It takes a color

the tests to be more tolerant, nothing critical. On Tuesday, March 3, 2026 at 10:10:18 PM UTC+1 Mike Taylor wrote: > > On 3/2/26 7:30 am, Chromestatus wrote: > > *Contact

be nice to have > the PR land. > > > Agree! Done. > > > -- Dan > > On Monday, March 2, 2026 at 11:27:29 AM UTC-8 Josh Karlin wrote: > > Thanks Vincent and

re going to get great data from other vendors, rather than web developers directly. Thomas, Patrick: any chance we can use the various browser devrel bat signals to ask developers if

-skipping to >> all glyphs - including CJK characters - whereas `auto` leaves CJK >> characters un-skipped because ink-skipping tends to produce undesirable >>

is limited to the one supported by >> CSSPseudoElement, yes >> >> On Friday, February 20, 2026 at 8:31:11 PM UTC+1 Vladimir Levin wrote: >> >>>

and having to >>>> chan >>>> >>>> I don't know where the second half of my sentence went - but it should >>>> read ", and

you planning to? We have not finalized on how this would work, and don't have concrete plans to implement anything. I think the key at this stage is to get more customer feedback.

introducing blur to the image in the process Note: spec wise this >>>>> is technically different than 'pixelated'. In actual implementations it is >

hard-to-address privacy conern here, but there might be a way around if we only allow a single profile to ever access this. Will ping you offline to discuss. Best, Alex On Wednesday,

TC39 proposal to add a method to sum multiple values > to JavaScript. Add an iterable-taking > `Math.sumPrecise` method which returns the sum of the > values in the iterable

roughly equivalent to the capabilities of other APIs such as getUserMedia(). While exposing information about a user's connected peripherals raises privacy concerns, many