any existing Payment Request or Payment Handler > positions? If so, it's probably fine to just add a comment to them > about this change, but if not, we should request one.

secure-payment-confirmation/blob/main/explainer-capabilities.md >>> . >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 3:10 PM Darwin Yang >>> wrote

sync, payment, etc.) completes on a stale registration (last update check > 24h). Chrome currently does not implement this. It updates only trigger via page navigations or a staleness

secure-payment-confirmation/issues/290#issuecomment-3806454419 Specification https://w3c.github.io/secure-payment-confirmation/#sctn-secure-payment-confirmation

up for payment authorization at the center of the >>> original window hosting the e-commerce website. >>> >>> Presumably the pop-up is a DOM element

ship a Payment Handler or integrate Payment Request into your website, you can stop reading here :). (bcc various payment-related mailing lists) Hi folks, In Chrome M143, we are launching

make a payment, and so on. >> >> Thanks, >> Peter >> >> On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 3:53 PM Carlos Solorzano >> wrote: >> >>> I'

-party payment service provider in cross-origin > iframes. With `autofill`, those frames can be marked as trustworthy so the > user agent can autofill them seamlessly. Today

secure-payment-confirmation specification (#307 > ). > > On Monday, July 14, 2025 at 10:09:19 PM UTC-4 Domenic Denicola wrote: > > This generally looks good, but

that any payment network can track users >>>> through the actual payments, just like Visa or Mastercard probably do for >>>> physical cards today, for good

secure-payment-confirmation/issues/197 https://github.com/w3c/secure-payment-confirmation/issues/275 Specification None Summary Updates the UX elements for the SPC

secure-payment-confirmation/issues/81#issuecomment-1527105768), >>>>>>>> but I don't think that will meaningfully change the shape of the

secure-payment-confirmation/issues/271 Specification https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/pejic/secure-payment-confirmation/pull/286.html Summary Adds an additional

secure-payment-confirmation/issues/267 >>> >>> Specificationhttps://github.com/w3c/secure-payment-confirmation/pull/281 >>> >>

contains multiple payment client schemes (to >> cover more ground) and the buyer has more than one of these clients >> installed? >> Will Chromium's prompt

io/payment-request/ >> >> Documentation https://web.dev/explore/payments >> >> (WebView-specific documentation will follow.) >> >>

secure-payment-confirmation. A few >>>> more /issues/267 >>>> >>>> >>>> SpecificationNone >>>> >>

for the payment link type proposal, we've decided to rename the `payment` keyword to `facilitated-payment` in the `rel` attribute. This is based on the conflict of microformat's

of their payment >> page documents, and have a mechanism to validate their integrity. In the >> absence of better mechanisms, developers and merchants will need to settle

>> payment providers like Stripe, single-sign on login forms, etc), and it >>> seems reasonable to assume that being able to gain insight into their state >>

t have payment APIs >>>>>>>> "figured out", but we've been able to learn and iterate >>>>>>>> >>>

On Sat, Jun 29, 2024, 4:28 AM 'Dylan Cutler' via blink-dev, < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Hey Vlad, > > Thanks for your

/embeds payment elements provides auth+integrity guarantees for all scripts executing in the parent, and importmap integrity is one of the missing pieces to enable that. We need

a mobile payment service provider that offers mobile > payment in multiple countries in Europe. > Multiple mobile network operators in Europe like few ones in Poland > currently

a personalized payment button that displays credit card information to give the user confidence that the payment flow will be smooth, or a personalized sign-in button. These sorts

authentication/payment flows, to make sure it doesn't break them? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> We have been dogfooding

TWA, Payment Handler API, > and the Digital Goods API I believe there is a path for IWA on mobile; yet > due to security concerns from the community (especially mozilla) it will

with the Payment Handler >> API. There are no API changes. The origin trial is concluding and we'd like >> to ship this feature in M119. See R2E >> >> for

late to the party, but here are a few inputs as an outsider web-app developer: 1. "In general, we are opposed to adding proprietary APIs via the

risk - Payment Request is already very > different on Apple browsers due to the tight coupling only > with Apple Pay. > > Rick > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 2:54 PM Nick Burris