make a payment, and so on. >> >> Thanks, >> Peter >> >> On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 3:53 PM Carlos Solorzano >> wrote: >> >>> I'

-party payment service provider in cross-origin > iframes. With `autofill`, those frames can be marked as trustworthy so the > user agent can autofill them seamlessly. Today

secure-payment-confirmation specification (#307 > ). > > On Monday, July 14, 2025 at 10:09:19 PM UTC-4 Domenic Denicola wrote: > > This generally looks good, but

that any payment network can track users >>>> through the actual payments, just like Visa or Mastercard probably do for >>>> physical cards today, for good

secure-payment-confirmation/issues/197 https://github.com/w3c/secure-payment-confirmation/issues/275 Specification None Summary Updates the UX elements for the SPC

secure-payment-confirmation/issues/81#issuecomment-1527105768), >>>>>>>> but I don't think that will meaningfully change the shape of the

secure-payment-confirmation/issues/271 Specification https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/pejic/secure-payment-confirmation/pull/286.html Summary Adds an additional

secure-payment-confirmation/issues/267 >>> >>> Specificationhttps://github.com/w3c/secure-payment-confirmation/pull/281 >>> >>

contains multiple payment client schemes (to >> cover more ground) and the buyer has more than one of these clients >> installed? >> Will Chromium's prompt

io/payment-request/ >> >> Documentation https://web.dev/explore/payments >> >> (WebView-specific documentation will follow.) >> >>

secure-payment-confirmation. A few >>>> more /issues/267 >>>> >>>> >>>> SpecificationNone >>>> >>

for the payment link type proposal, we've decided to rename the `payment` keyword to `facilitated-payment` in the `rel` attribute. This is based on the conflict of microformat's

of their payment >> page documents, and have a mechanism to validate their integrity. In the >> absence of better mechanisms, developers and merchants will need to settle

>> payment providers like Stripe, single-sign on login forms, etc), and it >>> seems reasonable to assume that being able to gain insight into their state >>

t have payment APIs >>>>>>>> "figured out", but we've been able to learn and iterate >>>>>>>> >>>

On Sat, Jun 29, 2024, 4:28 AM 'Dylan Cutler' via blink-dev, < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Hey Vlad, > > Thanks for your

/embeds payment elements provides auth+integrity guarantees for all scripts executing in the parent, and importmap integrity is one of the missing pieces to enable that. We need

a mobile payment service provider that offers mobile > payment in multiple countries in Europe. > Multiple mobile network operators in Europe like few ones in Poland > currently

a personalized payment button that displays credit card information to give the user confidence that the payment flow will be smooth, or a personalized sign-in button. These sorts

authentication/payment flows, to make sure it doesn't break them? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> We have been dogfooding

TWA, Payment Handler API, > and the Digital Goods API I believe there is a path for IWA on mobile; yet > due to security concerns from the community (especially mozilla) it will

with the Payment Handler >> API. There are no API changes. The origin trial is concluding and we'd like >> to ship this feature in M119. See R2E >> >> for

late to the party, but here are a few inputs as an outsider web-app developer: 1. "In general, we are opposed to adding proprietary APIs via the

risk - Payment Request is already very > different on Apple browsers due to the tight coupling only > with Apple Pay. > > Rick > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 2:54 PM Nick Burris

(personalized payment provider button) here and have received ecosystem support for the same. We hope to add support for this and other use cases that we learn from the ecosystem, and

, and payment flows often perform these kinds of > interactions. Accordingly, we don't expect SSO, federated authentication, > or payments flows to be impacted. For example

secure-payment-confirmation/pull/236 >>> >>> Design docshttps://docs.google.com/document/d/ >>> 1DW4hGyuVzcN8sE8TC3YOkg6xO4XpUGZQNxcHgfMXVwA

, embedded payment providers, >>> and subscribed video services. >>> >>> The Storage Access API provides a means for authenticated cross-site >

for all payment target types allows applications >>>> to offer user interactions with URIs that represent payment targets, >>>> simplifying the introduction

mechanism with Payment Request: >> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/PHT_2X7oRBE/m/gR9UiZxBAQAJ >> >> Intent for the general