capability to WebGPU that exposes a >>>> new WGSL shader builtin, 'primitive_index'. This builtin provides a >>>> per-primitive index to fragment

3d" WebGPU features add respectively >>>>>> support for 3D textures using Block Compression (BC) and Adaptive Scalable >>>>>> Texture

signifies a WebGPU adapter and >>> device support the core features and limits of the spec. Explainer: >>> https://gist.github.com/greggman/0dea9995e33393c546a4c2bd2a12e50e

googlers/webgpu-compatibility-mode/blob/main/README.md > > Specification > https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/blob/main/proposals/compatibility-mode.

working on WebGPU, this would require our API owners to talk with > their standard folks to come to some agreement there (though I don't know > who that might be so I can'

the other review sections started. > > On Wednesday, April 2, 2025 at 1:15:47 AM UTC-7 fbea...@google.com wrote: > >> Contact emails >> >> fbeaufort

to the WebGPU spec after its first >> shipment in a browser. The GPUAdapterInfo >> isFallbackAdapter boolean attribute indicates if an >> adapter has significant

so "WebGPU > Subgroups experimentation" is less confusing on > https://chromestatus.com/roadmap? > On 1/16/25 9:35 AM, Mike Taylor wrote: > > LGTM3

for the review Mike! >>>> >>>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 5:30 PM Mike Taylor >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>

Blink>WebGPU > > > > *TAG review* > > None > > > *TAG review status* > > Pending > > > *Risks* > > > > > *Interoperability

>> WebGPU due to lack of support or old macOS versions (which are no longer >>>> supported by any browser). The 1-component vertex formats lets applications >

TR/webgpu/#dom-gpudevice-adapterinfo >> >> Summary >> >> Functionality added to the WebGPU spec after its first shipment in a >> browser. >

flip the review bits for >> privacy/security/enterprise/testing/debuggability? >> >> >> Done! >> >> On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 11:23 AM Alex

comes to WebGPU. >> >> To address this, WebGPU has a GPU feature system where developers can >> check if a device supports specific functionalities. >> >

functionality to WebGPU. Subgroup operations perform >>>>> SIMT operations to provide efficient communication and data sharing among >>>>>

to the WebGPU spec after its first shipment in a >>> browser. Once GPUCanvasContext configure() has been called with a >>> configuration dictionary, the GPUCanvasContext

field to WebGPU texture view creation to request a subset of the usage flags from the source texture. By default, texture view usage inherits from the source texture but there are view

interest in WebGPU support for WebXR because they believe it will give them better performance and access to more GPU features. Please let me know if you need any help or if the prototype

of where TAG was able to bring alignment to various APIs. I think what makes the situation difficult here is that WebGPU is a very active specification that gains new minor features or

TR/webgpu/#gpucanvastonemappingmode >>> >>> >>> I found the spec for the toneMapping member a bit confusing. I filed >>> https://github

functionality to WebGPU. Subgroup operations perform SIMT >> operations to provide efficient communication and data sharing among groups >> of invocations. These

to the WebGPU spec after its first > shipment in a browser. Adds a synchronous GPUAdapter > info attribute to retrieve the same information about > the physical adapter as

seconds then WebGPU operations will soon after. There isn't a >> lot of use in keeping WebGPU computations running for much longer as >> Javascript is needed to get

to the WebGPU spec after its first shipment in a browser. ServiceWorker and SharedWorker support is added to WebGPU, aligning with existing WebGL capabilities. Blink componentBlink

to the WebGPU/WGSL spec after its first shipment in a >> browser. Adds support using a render pass to render to slices of 3D >> textures in addition to rendering to 2D textures

testing in WebGPU and will definitely not >> let a feature get enabled without tests being completed so >> hopefully it's ok to LGTM without them? We totally expect

to the WebGPU/WGSL spec after its > first shipment in a browser. Adds support for (read-only > and) read-write storage textures which allow more general > access to texture

>> WebGPU now allows developers to omit entry points to shader modules >>>> when creating a pipeline, improving ergonomics. If no default entry point >>

>> WebGPU timestamp queries allow WebGPU applications to measure precisely >> (down to the nanosecond) how much time their GPU commands take to execute, >> especially

of the review gates in the chromestatus entry. >>> >> Ah yes - please do start those reviews. Likely you can mark them as N/A >> because this is just shipping an