Groups
Conversations
All groups and messages
Send feedback to Google
Help
Training
Sign in
Groups
blink-dev
Conversations
About
Sort By Relevance
Sort By Date
1–28 of 28
Chris Fredrickson
, …
Mike Taylor
7
Oct 12
Intent to Ship: FedCM as a trust signal for the Storage Access API
> generic
Storage
Access
API
prompt. > > One piece of feedback we got on the
API
was a question on > whether `navigator.credentials.preventSilentAccess()` > should
unread,
Intent to Ship: FedCM as a trust signal for the Storage Access API
> generic
Storage
Access
API
prompt. > > One piece of feedback we got on the
API
was a question on > whether `navigator.credentials.preventSilentAccess()` > should
Oct 12
Chris Fredrickson
, …
Mike Taylor
13
Sep 12
Intent to Experiment: FedCM as a trust signal for the Storage Access API
> Other
API
OWNERs may disagree with me (and that's OK), but I'm > not personally inclined to approve an extension here in order > to prevent a small gap in availability
unread,
Intent to Experiment: FedCM as a trust signal for the Storage Access API
> Other
API
OWNERs may disagree with me (and that's OK), but I'm > not personally inclined to approve an extension here in order > to prevent a small gap in availability
Sep 12
Johann Hofmann
, …
ابوعمار الغظنفر
18
Aug 29
Intent to Ship: First-party sets
the Blink
API
owners would >>>>>>>>>>>>> still review it carefully, but in the context of the other intents that >>>>>
unread,
Intent to Ship: First-party sets
the Blink
API
owners would >>>>>>>>>>>>> still review it carefully, but in the context of the other intents that >>>>>
Aug 29
Aaron Selya
, …
Aaron Selya
25
Aug 24
Intent to Ship: Adding Cross-site Ancestor Chain Bit to CHIPS Partition Key
Update: The feature has landed in M128 stable. The flag name associated with this feature has changed since the I2S from
unread,
Intent to Ship: Adding Cross-site Ancestor Chain Bit to CHIPS Partition Key
Update: The feature has landed in M128 stable. The flag name associated with this feature has changed since the I2S from
Aug 24
Joshua Hood
,
Mike Taylor
3
Aug 6
Intent to Experiment: Origin Trial for Third Party Cookie Deprecation
CHIPS,
Storage
Access
API
, > Related Website Sets, FedCM, etc. > > Experiment Risks > > No, since this experiment allows sites to opt-in to limiting third-party >
unread,
Intent to Experiment: Origin Trial for Third Party Cookie Deprecation
CHIPS,
Storage
Access
API
, > Related Website Sets, FedCM, etc. > > Experiment Risks > > No, since this experiment allows sites to opt-in to limiting third-party >
Aug 6
Mike Taylor
, …
Brett McStotts
82
Jul 11
Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs
us if
storage
partitioning is disabled. It just tells you if there is unpartitioned cookie
access
. That will always return false post-3PCD. It will also return true pre-3PCD with
storage
unread,
Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs
us if
storage
partitioning is disabled. It just tells you if there is unpartitioned cookie
access
. That will always return false post-3PCD. It will also return true pre-3PCD with
storage
Jul 11
Ari Chivukula
, …
Rick Byers
11
May 24
Intent to Ship: Extending Storage Access API (SAA) to non-cookie storage
indicate if
access
to non-cookie
storage
via requestStorageAccess was granted, it *only* indicates if unpartitioned cookies are available in the given context (which may have been
unread,
Intent to Ship: Extending Storage Access API (SAA) to non-cookie storage
indicate if
access
to non-cookie
storage
via requestStorageAccess was granted, it *only* indicates if unpartitioned cookies are available in the given context (which may have been
May 24
Sam LeDoux
, …
Johann Hofmann
3
Apr 23
Intent to Prototype: Storage Access API Headers
cfredric/
storage
-
access
-headers/issues/7, implementing > arturjanc's proposal ("Require Activate-
Storage
-
Access
to specify not only > permission, but
unread,
Intent to Prototype: Storage Access API Headers
cfredric/
storage
-
access
-headers/issues/7, implementing > arturjanc's proposal ("Require Activate-
Storage
-
Access
to specify not only > permission, but
Apr 23
Johann Hofmann
Mar 21
Intent to Prototype: FedCM as a trust signal for the Storage Access API
googlers/
storage
-
access
-for-fedcm Specification None Summary Reconciles the Federated Credential Management (FedCM) and
Storage
Access
APIs by making a prior permission grant
unread,
Intent to Prototype: FedCM as a trust signal for the Storage Access API
googlers/
storage
-
access
-for-fedcm Specification None Summary Reconciles the Federated Credential Management (FedCM) and
Storage
Access
APIs by making a prior permission grant
Mar 21
Ari Chivukula
, …
Yoav Weiss (@Shopify)
3
Mar 11
Intent to Extend Experiment: Extending Storage Access API (SAA) to non-cookie storage
cookie-
storage
/ > > Feedback > > https://github.com/privacycg/saa-non-cookie-
storage
/issues > > Design Doc > > > https://docs.google.com/document
unread,
Intent to Extend Experiment: Extending Storage Access API (SAA) to non-cookie storage
cookie-
storage
/ > > Feedback > > https://github.com/privacycg/saa-non-cookie-
storage
/issues > > Design Doc > > > https://docs.google.com/document
Mar 11
Ari Chivukula
, …
Rick Byers
9
Feb 20
[blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Extending Storage Access API (SAA) to non-cookie storage
cookie-
storage
/ ~ Ari Chivukula (Their/There/They're) On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 1:41 PM Ari Chivukula wrote: > Please note the repo has been moved into PrivacyCG, and the new
unread,
[blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Extending Storage Access API (SAA) to non-cookie storage
cookie-
storage
/ ~ Ari Chivukula (Their/There/They're) On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 1:41 PM Ari Chivukula wrote: > Please note the repo has been moved into PrivacyCG, and the new
Feb 20
Ben Kelly
, …
Johann Hofmann
11
Jan 25
Request for Deprecation Trial: Deprecate Third-Party Cookies
Hi Blink
API
owners, >>>>> >>>>> We would like to request your approval for adding a first-party >>>>> version of this Deprecation
unread,
Request for Deprecation Trial: Deprecate Third-Party Cookies
Hi Blink
API
owners, >>>>> >>>>> We would like to request your approval for adding a first-party >>>>> version of this Deprecation
Jan 25
Ari Chivukula
2
Jan 17
[blink-dev] PSA: Extending Storage Access API (SAA) to non-cookie storage Explainer
extension to
Storage
Access
API
(SAA) to non-cookie
storage
) have been published! Explainer: Extending
Storage
Access
API
(SAA) to omit unpartitioned cookies The current
Storage
unread,
[blink-dev] PSA: Extending Storage Access API (SAA) to non-cookie storage Explainer
extension to
Storage
Access
API
(SAA) to non-cookie
storage
) have been published! Explainer: Extending
Storage
Access
API
(SAA) to omit unpartitioned cookies The current
Storage
Jan 17
Ari Chivukula
,
Jesper van den Ende
9
12/9/23
Intent to Prototype: Extending Storage Access API (SAA) to non-cookie storage
you to
access
first-party SharedWorkers, those workers would have >>
access
to SameSite=Strict cookies. Chrome's decision at this juncture is to >> not provide
unread,
Intent to Prototype: Extending Storage Access API (SAA) to non-cookie storage
you to
access
first-party SharedWorkers, those workers would have >>
access
to SameSite=Strict cookies. Chrome's decision at this juncture is to >> not provide
12/9/23
Yi Gu
11/30/23
PSA: FedCM: Chrome relaxes explicit mediation requirement if IdP has third party cookies access
the FedCM
API
, when a user is signing in to a relying party (RP) with an identity provider (IdP) in the browser for the first time, the browser will treat them as a “new” user since it didn
unread,
PSA: FedCM: Chrome relaxes explicit mediation requirement if IdP has third party cookies access
the FedCM
API
, when a user is signing in to a relying party (RP) with an identity provider (IdP) in the browser for the first time, the browser will treat them as a “new” user since it didn
11/30/23
Stephen Mcgruer
, …
Reilly Grant
5
11/13/23
Intent to Prototype: Allow for WebAuthn credential creation in a cross-origin iframe
PaymentRequest and
Storage
access
API
effectively all follow > this policy too. 3PCD doesn't block cross-origin information sharing, it > just requires user consent
unread,
Intent to Prototype: Allow for WebAuthn credential creation in a cross-origin iframe
PaymentRequest and
Storage
access
API
effectively all follow > this policy too. 3PCD doesn't block cross-origin information sharing, it > just requires user consent
11/13/23
Christian Biesinger
, …
Yoav Weiss
9
10/26/23
Intent to ship: The Login Status API and its use in FedCM
browser-
api
-login-status. Since WebKit > has expressed some interest in using this
API
in other scenarios than just > FedCM I imagine there may be a request at some point to move
unread,
Intent to ship: The Login Status API and its use in FedCM
browser-
api
-login-status. Since WebKit > has expressed some interest in using this
API
in other scenarios than just > FedCM I imagine there may be a request at some point to move
10/26/23
Chris Fredrickson
10/25/23
PSA: Storage Access API & dedicated workers
" the
storage
-
access
status of their parent (whether the parent is a document, or is another worker). This behavior is not specified by the
Storage
Access
API
(SAA) spec, but is
unread,
PSA: Storage Access API & dedicated workers
" the
storage
-
access
status of their parent (whether the parent is a document, or is another worker). This behavior is not specified by the
Storage
Access
API
(SAA) spec, but is
10/25/23
Chris Fredrickson
, …
Mike Taylor
12
10/16/23
Intent to Ship: Storage Access API with Prompts
chrome-
storage
-
access
-
api
#testing-instructions > > On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 1:26:10 PM UTC-4 Mike Taylor wrote: > >> LGTM3 >> On 8/22/23 10:49 AM,
unread,
Intent to Ship: Storage Access API with Prompts
chrome-
storage
-
access
-
api
#testing-instructions > > On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 1:26:10 PM UTC-4 Mike Taylor wrote: > >> LGTM3 >> On 8/22/23 10:49 AM,
10/16/23
Shuran Huang
6/26/23
Intent to Prototype: Storage Access API with Prompts
chrome-
storage
-
access
-
api
https://github.com/privacycg/
storage
-
access
/blob/main/README.md Specification https://privacycg.github.io/
storage
-
access
Summary The
unread,
Intent to Prototype: Storage Access API with Prompts
chrome-
storage
-
access
-
api
https://github.com/privacycg/
storage
-
access
/blob/main/README.md Specification https://privacycg.github.io/
storage
-
access
Summary The
6/26/23
Johann Hofmann
, …
Alex Russell
5
4/14/23
Intent to Ship: Storage Access API (within First-Party Sets)
shipping an
API
that we're unhappy with (arguably the name is what we're really most unhappy about). Through our involvement we were able to go back to key design concerns (
unread,
Intent to Ship: Storage Access API (within First-Party Sets)
shipping an
API
that we're unhappy with (arguably the name is what we're really most unhappy about). Through our involvement we were able to go back to key design concerns (
4/14/23
Johann Hofmann
, …
Chris Fredrickson
7
4/10/23
Intent to Ship: requestStorageAccessFor (for First-Party Sets)
describes the
API
shape and behavior. The design we're shipping is the "singular" one from the explainer. The discussion of the "plural"
API
in the explainer
unread,
Intent to Ship: requestStorageAccessFor (for First-Party Sets)
describes the
API
shape and behavior. The design we're shipping is the "singular" one from the explainer. The discussion of the "plural"
API
in the explainer
4/10/23
Dylan Cutler
, …
Craciun, Mircea
38
4/10/23
Intent to Ship: Cookies Having Independent Partitioned State (CHIPS)
THANK YOU ALL for the help especially Eric! Best regards, Mircea On 8. Apr 2023, at 15:25, Kaustubha Govind wrote: Circling back on the main thread.
unread,
Intent to Ship: Cookies Having Independent Partitioned State (CHIPS)
THANK YOU ALL for the help especially Eric! Best regards, Mircea On 8. Apr 2023, at 15:25, Kaustubha Govind wrote: Circling back on the main thread.
4/10/23
Chris Fredrickson
12/1/22
Ready for Trial: First-Party Sets
handle cookie
access
accordingly. The First-Party Sets proposal has undergone some changes since we sent the previous Intents. In particular: - We have introduced the notion of "
unread,
Ready for Trial: First-Party Sets
handle cookie
access
accordingly. The First-Party Sets proposal has undergone some changes since we sent the previous Intents. In particular: - We have introduced the notion of "
12/1/22
Matt Reichhoff
, …
Matt Reichhoff
3
8/17/22
Intent to Prototype: requestStorageAccessForSite
on the
storage
access
repo, which I've now filed . Feedback is welcome! Thanks! On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 5:14 PM 'Brandon Maslen' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium
unread,
Intent to Prototype: requestStorageAccessForSite
on the
storage
access
repo, which I've now filed . Feedback is welcome! Thanks! On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 5:14 PM 'Brandon Maslen' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium
8/17/22
Dylan Cutler
7/1/21
Intent to Prototype: Cookies Having Independent Partitioned State (CHIPS)
the Request
Storage
Access
API
instead of a cookie attribute. Ergonomics The initial implementation will support the Partitioned attribute as a way third-party servers can opt-
unread,
Intent to Prototype: Cookies Having Independent Partitioned State (CHIPS)
the Request
Storage
Access
API
instead of a cookie attribute. Ergonomics The initial implementation will support the Partitioned attribute as a way third-party servers can opt-
7/1/21
Adam Langley
, …
Ken Buchanan
21
5/13/20
Intent to Implement and Ship: Web Authenticator API: cross-origin iframe support
`,
Storage
Access
API
, etc). >>> >>> -mike >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 5:34 PM Ken Buchanan wrote: >>> >>>
unread,
Intent to Implement and Ship: Web Authenticator API: cross-origin iframe support
`,
Storage
Access
API
, etc). >>> >>> -mike >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 5:34 PM Ken Buchanan wrote: >>> >>>
5/13/20
Brandon Maslen
, …
Michaela Merz
16
9/10/19
Intent to Implement: Storage Access API
of this
API
. > > While it is true that the other implementations (Firefox/Safari) rely on > user gesture to gate the potential success of requesting
storage
access
so >
unread,
Intent to Implement: Storage Access API
of this
API
. > > While it is true that the other implementations (Firefox/Safari) rely on > user gesture to gate the potential success of requesting
storage
access
so >
9/10/19