LGTM to experiment from M148 to M151 inclusive. > On 4/9/26 2:49 pm, Philip Rogers wrote: > > *Contact emails* > chri...@chromium.org, schenney...@chromium.org, pdr

LGTM to experiment from M148 to M150 inclusive. On 4/8/26 7:23 pm, Chromestatus wrote: > *Contact emails* > ekaramad@chromium.org, iclelland@chromium.org, mustaq@chromium

dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Web Install API Hello! Could you comment on the progress made in each of these areas? * Draft spec (early draft is ok, but must be spec-like and associated

Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, > such that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based > applications? > > /No information

LGTM to experiment from M148 to M153 inclusive. On 4/1/26 3:41 pm, Deepti Bogadi wrote: > > Contact emails > > memmott@google.com, dbogadi@google.com, msw@google.

LGTM to experiment M148-M150 inclusive On Wednesday, April 1, 2026 at 5:17:45 PM UTC+2 Noam Rosenthal wrote: > On Wed, Apr 1, 2026 at 3:55 PM Daniel Bratell wrote: > >> Has

Subject: Intent to Experiment: Container Timing Contact emailsjwilliams720@bloomberg.net Explainerhttps://github.com/WICG/container-timing Specification https://

LGTM to experiment On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 4:33 PM Chromestatus < admin@cr-status.appspotmail.com> wrote: > *Contact emails* > kschmi@microsoft.com > > *Explainer

LGTM to experiment M148-M153 incusive On Thursday, March 26, 2026 at 12:47:06 AM UTC+1 liahi...@microsoft.com wrote: > *Contact emails* > > liahiscock@microsoft.com

to previous Intent discussions > > Intent to Prototype: > https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/68b670ba.050a0220.270bc4.0593.GAE%40google

to > experiment 145-147 inclusive. > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 2:52 PM Reilly > Grant wrote: > > On Friday, December 19, 2025 at > 11:50:19 AM UTC-8 Chromestatus

proposal to experiment with a set of FedCM >> extensions to provide a structured tool to allow agentic >> browsers to log users in to websites safely using their >>

Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that > it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications? > *No information provided

willing to experiment so 3 milestones might be a bit short. Either way, you have the required lgtm so good luck! It seems like a useful API. And you can request an extension if it's

> early Intent-to-Ship (I2S). I definitely share the goal of filing it soon. >>>>> >>>>> However, since the primary purpose of this extension

is this intent asking for an extension to the previous 144 end >>>> date? >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> Alex >>

Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such >>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications? >>>>

LGTM to experiment from M141 to M147 inclusive. > > On 8/13/25 4:40 pm, 'Thomas Lively' via blink-dev wrote: >> Good question! The first toolchain to support

Thanks, Noam. LGTM1. On Monday, March 9, 2026 at 12:03:32 PM UTC-7 Noam Rosenthal wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2026, 6:53 PM Alex Russell >

Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that > it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications? > *No information provided

LGTM to experiment from M146 to M151 inclusive. On 3/5/26 8:37 pm, Huanpo Lin wrote: > Not quite sure about why the system is not including Goals for > experimentation correctly

Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such > that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications? > > /No information provided

run the experiment (I am supportive too, > FWIW), but one question below: > > Technically, niche issues remain where in serialization, with the new Rust > parser we may

from this intent. >> >> Best, >> >> Alex >> >> On Wednesday, January 28, 2026 at 10:05:36 AM UTC-8 Chris Thompson wrote: >> >>>

Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that > it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?* > > Low. The change is to

of the experiment. thanks, Mike On 1/29/26 11:57 am, Garrett Johnson wrote: > Was this extended beyond Chrome 141, or was that the end of the > experimental labels? > Thanks

LGTM to experiment from M145 to M150 inclusive. On 1/21/26 4:04 pm, Michael Wilson wrote: > *Contact emails* > hongchan@chromium.org, mjwilson@chromium.org > > *Specification

LGTM to experiment M144-M149 inclusive (6 milestones, rather than the requested 7) Please change the chrome status entry to indicate the above. On Tuesday, January 13, 2026 at 7:28

LGTM to experiment an additional 3 milestones from M145 to M147 inclusive. On 1/8/26 9:30 pm, Yoshisato Yanagisawa wrote: > Thank you for the question. Here is what we've learned

LGTM to experiment M144-M148 inclusive On Wednesday, December 17, 2025 at 6:57:15 PM UTC+1 Minh Le wrote: > Dear Blink-dev owners, > > I added "Experiment goals"