of the experiment. thanks, Mike On 1/29/26 11:57 am, Garrett Johnson wrote: > Was this extended beyond Chrome 141, or was that the end of the > experimental labels? > Thanks

Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications? Low. The change is to ship a new API.

our original Intent-to-Ship for Local Network Access . The same opt-out applies to the followup work we are doing to apply LNA restrictions to WebSockets (planned for M147), so we want

LGTM to experiment from M145 to M150 inclusive. On 1/21/26 4:04 pm, Michael Wilson wrote: > *Contact emails* > hongchan@chromium.org, mjwilson@chromium.org > > *Specification

the early Intent-to-Ship (I2S). I definitely share the goal of filing it soon. However, since the primary purpose of this extension was to secure the crucial, large-scale performance

LGTM to experiment M144-M149 inclusive (6 milestones, rather than the requested 7) Please change the chrome status entry to indicate the above. On Tuesday, January 13, 2026 at 7:28

LGTM to experiment an additional 3 milestones from M145 to M147 inclusive. On 1/8/26 9:30 pm, Yoshisato Yanagisawa wrote: > Thank you for the question. Here is what we've learned

LGTM to experiment 145-147 inclusive. > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 2:52 PM Reilly Grant wrote: > >> On Friday, December 19, 2025 at 11:50:19 AM UTC-8 Chromestatus wrote

LGTM to experiment M144-M148 inclusive On Wednesday, December 17, 2025 at 6:57:15 PM UTC+1 Minh Le wrote: > Dear Blink-dev owners, > > I added "Experiment goals"

more developers experiment with this API. >>> >>> WebView application risks >>> >>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing

Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that > it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications? > *No information provided

discuss this intent. LGTM to extend to M146, contingent on the fact that we set up a renewal flow that only allows renewals for existing participants. However, Camille will be out for

Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that >> it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications? >> *No information

LGTM to experiment from 143 to 148 inclusive. On 11/4/25 1:37 pm, 'Lia Hiscock' via blink-dev wrote: > We're requesting m143 to m148 inclusive. > > Thanks! >

review the Intent to Extend Experimentation >> for the Writer API. Let me know if you have any questions. >> >> Thanks, >> Deepti >> >> >>

Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such >>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications? >>> None >

Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that > it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications? > None > > > *Goals

proposal in Intent to Experiment: >> TCP Socket Pool per-Top-Level-Site >> . >> Unlike that proposal, this one uses randomization to mitigate attacks >>

support this intent. >>> >>> Stephen. >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 11:45 AM Ari Chivukula >>> wrote: >>> >>>

extend the experiment to 145 inclusive On Wednesday, October 8, 2025 at 11:25:22 AM UTC-4 Vladimir Levin wrote: > LGTM > > On Wednesday, October 8, 2025 at 11:14:48 AM UTC-

Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that >> it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications? >> None >> >

LGTM to experiment M141-M144 (The title confused me as I thought this is an intent to extend an experiment..) On Wednesday, September 24, 2025 at 1:37:14 AM UTC+2 Carlos IL wrote: >

> Exciting experiment! LGTM. > > Do you have plans to publish your results? > > On Monday, September 15, 2025 at 9:45:35 AM UTC-7 Ari Chivukula wrote: > >> Contact

Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing > APIs, such that it has potentially high risk for Android > WebView-based applications? > > None > > >

Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such >>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications? >>> >>

the > experiment. Please let me know if there are any such concerns or > action items currently known. > > (I added a comment to the requests-for-position about the per-

LGTM to experiment from M142 to M144. On 8/26/25 12:20 am, Daniel Rubery wrote: > > > Contact emails > > drubery@chromium.org, thefrog@chromium.org, arnarb@chromium

LGTM to experiment from M141 to M147 inclusive. On 8/13/25 4:40 pm, 'Thomas Lively' via blink-dev wrote: > Good question! The first toolchain to support custom descriptors

why the Experiment Goals became empty, but let me copy contents >>> from chromestatus. >>> >>> 2025年7月18日(金) 12:25 Chromestatus : >>> >

for the experiment: >> >> - *Cross-platform timeline*: Having a roadmap for macOS/Linux/Android >> would help us plan our development strategy beyond the Windows